Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33922917›Full record

ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Malaria Rapid Diagnostic Tests: Literary Review and Recommendation for a Quality Assurance, Quality Control Algorithm.

Michael J Kavanaugh, Steven E Azzam, David M Rockabrand

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
11.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 88 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Challenges in Malaria Diagnosis and Treatment in Kinshasa Province, Democratic Republic of the Congo.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Michael J KavanaughNavy Medicine Leadership and Professional Development Center, 8955 Wood Road, Building 1, Rm 1709, Bethesda, MD 20889, USA.
Steven E AzzamDepartment of Internal Medicine, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD 20814, USA.
David M RockabrandDepartment of Biology and Chemistry, Liberty University, 1971 University Blvd, Lynchburg, VA 24515, USA.
Liberty University · USUnited States Department of the Navy · USWalter Reed National Military Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Malaria rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) have had an enormous global impact which contributed to the World Health Organization paradigm shift from empiric treatment to obtaining a parasitological diagnosis prior to treatment. Microscopy, the classic standard, requires significant expertise, equipment, electricity, and reagents. Alternatively, RDT's lower complexity allows utilization in austere environments while achieving similar sensitivities and specificities. Worldwide, there are over 200 different RDT brands that utilize three antigens: Plasmodium histidine-rich protein 2 (

Indexed as

clinical lab improvement actclinical laboratory standardscollege of american pathologistsmalaria rapid diagnostic test (RDT)plasmodium histidine-rich protein (HRP)

Identifiers

PMID33922917
PMCPMC8145891
OpenAlexW3157773549

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.