Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33922745›Full record

Trial reportInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

Complications in the Use of Deepithelialized Free Gingival Graft vs. Connective Tissue Graft: A One-Year Randomized Clinical Trial.

Silvestre Ripoll, Angela Fernández de Velasco-Tarilonte, Beatriz Bullón, Blanca Ríos-Carrasco, Ana Fernández-Palacín

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Silvestre RipollClínica Dental Silvestre Ripoll, Marqués de Paradas 40 Local, 41001 Sevilla, Spain.
Angela Fernández de Velasco-TarilonteDepartment of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Universidad de Sevilla, C/Avicena S/N, 41009 Sevilla, Spain.
Beatriz BullónDepartment of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Universidad de Sevilla, C/Avicena S/N, 41009 Sevilla, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-3996-3280
Blanca Ríos-CarrascoDepartment of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Universidad de Sevilla, C/Avicena S/N, 41009 Sevilla, Spain.
Ana Fernández-PalacínDepartamento de Ciencias Sociosanitarias, Universidad de Sevilla, 41004 Sevilla, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the treatment of gingival recession, different surgical options have been described: free gingival grafts (FGG), connective tissue Grafts (CTG), and a more recent technique, de-epithelialized free gingival graft (DFGG). They are not procedures exempt from the appearance of complications. Most publications refer to postoperative complications, and there is limited literature regarding the development of late complications (weeks or months). Our working group carried out a study to describe the development of late complications associated with the use of DFGG in comparison with CTG, providing an incidence rate and a classification. Sixty-eight patients with mucogingival problems were selected, and divided into two groups: the Test Group, for which we used DFGG + Coronal Advancement Flap (CAF), and the Control Group (CTG + CAF). All patients were treated at the University of Seville's dental school to solve mucogingival problems for aesthetic and/or functional reasons. A classification is proposed based on its severity; Major and Minor. Major complications included reepithelialization of the graft, epithelial bands, cul-de-sac, epithelial cysts, and bone exostoses. Minor complications included the graft´s color changes and superficial revascularization. Late major complications were only associated with the use of the DFGG, and the late minor complications developed with the use of the DFGG were much higher than those associated with CTG. CTG appears to be a safer procedure than DFGG in terms of late complications.

Indexed as

GingivaGingival RecessionConnective TissueFollow-Up StudiesHumansTooth RootTreatment Outcomebone exostosesConnective Tissue Grafts (CTG)cul-de-sacDe-Epithelialized Free Gingival Graft (DFGG)epithelial bandsepithelial cystsFree Gingival Grafts (FGG)late complicationsreepithelializationrevascularization

Identifiers

PMID33922745
PMCPMC8123082

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.