Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33922563›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Automated Non-Contact Respiratory Rate Monitoring of Neonates Based on Synchronous Evaluation of a 3D Time-of-Flight Camera and a Microwave Interferometric Radar Sensor.

Johanna Gleichauf, Sven Herrmann, Lukas Hennemann, Hannes Krauss, Janina Nitschke, Philipp Renner, Christine Niebler, Alexander Koelpin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Electromagnetic Imaging for Breathing Monitoring.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Laser spectroscopic method for remote sensing of respiratory rate.Physical and engineering sciences in medicine · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Johanna GleichaufNuremberg Institute of Technology, 90489 Nürnberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2702-1077
Sven HerrmannNuremberg Institute of Technology, 90489 Nürnberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0507-6923
Lukas HennemannNuremberg Institute of Technology, 90489 Nürnberg, Germany.
Hannes KraussNuremberg Institute of Technology, 90489 Nürnberg, Germany.
Janina NitschkeNuremberg Institute of Technology, 90489 Nürnberg, Germany.
Philipp RennerNuremberg Institute of Technology, 90489 Nürnberg, Germany.
Christine NieblerNuremberg Institute of Technology, 90489 Nürnberg, Germany.
Alexander KoelpinInstitute of High-Frequency Technology, Hamburg University of Technology, 21073 Hamburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9071-5661
Nuremberg Hospital · DEUniversität Hamburg · DE

Funding

Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung 13FH546IX6
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper introduces an automatic non-contact monitoring method based on the synchronous evaluation of a 3D time-of-flight (ToF) camera and a microwave interferometric radar sensor for measuring the respiratory rate of neonates. The current monitoring on the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) has several issues which can cause pressure marks, skin irritations and eczema. To minimize these risks, a non-contact system made up of a 3D time-of-flight camera and a microwave interferometric radar sensor is presented. The 3D time-of-flight camera delivers 3D point clouds which can be used to calculate the change in distance of the moving chest and from it the respiratory rate. The disadvantage of the ToF camera is that the heartbeat cannot be determined. The microwave interferometric radar sensor determines the change in displacement caused by the respiration and is even capable of measuring the small superimposed movements due to the heartbeat. The radar sensor is very sensitive towards movement artifacts due to, e.g., the baby moving its arms. To allow a robust vital parameter detection the data of both sensors was evaluated synchronously. In this publication, we focus on the first step: determining the respiratory rate. After all processing steps, the respiratory rate determined by the radar sensor was compared to the value received from the 3D time-of-flight camera. The method was validated against our gold standard: a self-developed neonatal simulation system which can simulate different breathing patterns. In this paper, we show that we are the first to determine the respiratory rate by evaluating the data of an interferometric microwave radar sensor and a ToF camera synchronously. Our system delivers very precise breaths per minute (BPM) values within the norm range of 20-60 BPM with a maximum difference of 3 BPM (for the ToF camera itself at 30 BPM in

Indexed as

RadarRespiratory RateHumansInfant, NewbornMicrowavesMonitoring, PhysiologicRespirationSignal Processing, Computer-Assistedneonatesnon-contact monitoringrespiratory ratesynchronous evaluation

Identifiers

PMID33922563
PMCPMC8122919
OpenAlexW3158303258

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.