Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33921935›Full record

ArticleBiosensors2021

Evaluation of the Diagnostic Accuracy of a New Biosensors-Based Rapid Diagnostic Test for the Point-Of-Care Diagnosis of Previous and Recent Dengue Infections in Malaysia.

Zhuo Lin Chong, Hui Jen Soe, Amni Adilah Ismail, Tooba Mahboob, Samudi Chandramathi, Shamala Devi Sekaran

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biosensors, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Dengue Seroprevalence and Factors Associated with Dengue Seropositivity in Petaling District, Malaysia.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Zhuo Lin ChongCentre for Communicable Diseases Research, Institute for Public Health, National Institutes of Health, Ministry of Health, Persiaran Setia Murni, Setia Alam, Shah Alam 40170, Selangor, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0003-3621-7079
Hui Jen SoeDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Jalan Profesor Diraja Ungku Aziz, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0002-6118-3408
Amni Adilah IsmailDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Jalan Profesor Diraja Ungku Aziz, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia.
Tooba MahboobDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Jalan Profesor Diraja Ungku Aziz, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia.
Samudi ChandramathiDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Jalan Profesor Diraja Ungku Aziz, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia.
Shamala Devi SekaranFaculty of Medical & Health Sciences, UCSI University, Jalan Menara Gading, Cheras, Kuala Lumpur 56000, Malaysia.
University of Malaya · MYMinistry of Health · MYUCSI University · MY

Funding

BluSense Diagnostics, Denmark GEM-FEA01-SP
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dengue is a major threat to public health globally. While point-of-care diagnosis of acute/recent dengue is available to reduce its mortality, a lack of rapid and accurate testing for the detection of previous dengue remains a hurdle in expanding dengue seroepidemiological surveys to inform its prevention, especially vaccination, to reduce dengue morbidity. This study evaluated ViroTrack Dengue Serostate, a biosensors-based semi-quantitative anti-dengue IgG (immunoglobulin G) immuno-magnetic agglutination assay for the diagnosis of previous and recent dengue in a single test. Blood samples were obtained from 484 healthy participants recruited randomly from two communities in Petaling district, Selangor, Malaysia. The reference tests were Panbio Dengue IgG indirect and capture enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays, in-house hemagglutination inhibition assay, and focus reduction neutralization test. Dengue Serostate had a sensitivity and specificity of 91.1% (95%CI 87.8-93.8) and 91.1% (95%CI 83.8-95.8) for the diagnosis of previous dengue, and 90.2% (95%CI 76.9-97.3) and 93.2% (95%CI 90.5-95.4) for the diagnosis of recent dengue, respectively. Its positive predictive value of 97.5% (95%CI 95.3-98.8) would prevent most dengue-naïve individuals from being vaccinated. ViroTrack Dengue Serostate's good point-of-care diagnostic accuracy can ease the conduct of dengue serosurveys to inform dengue vaccination strategy and facilitate pre-vaccination screening to ensure safety.

Indexed as

Biosensing TechniquesPoint-of-Care TestingAdultAntibodies, ViralDengueDiagnostic Tests, RoutineEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayFemaleHumansImmunoglobulin GMalaysiaPoint-of-Care SystemsSensitivity and SpecificityYoung AdultAntibodies, ViralImmunoglobulin Gbiosensorsdenguediagnostic accuracyimmuno-magnetic agglutination assaypoint-of-care diagnosisprevious and recent denguerapid diagnostic testseroepidemiological surveyvaccination strategy

Identifiers

PMID33921935
PMCPMC8143448
OpenAlexW3156253979

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.