Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33921838›Full record

ReviewCancers2021

Distal Pancreatectomy with Celiac Axis Resection: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Giuseppe Nigri, Niccolò Petrucciani, Elena Belloni, Alessio Lucarini, Paolo Aurello, Francesco D'Angelo, Salomone di Saverio, Alessandro Fancellu, Giovanni Ramacciato

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Distal and Total Pancreatectomy With En Bloc Celiac Axis Resection for Pancreatic Cancer at a High-Volume Center.Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Giuseppe NigriDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Sant'Andrea Hospital, 00189 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7656-7789
Niccolò PetruccianiDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Sant'Andrea Hospital, 00189 Rome, Italy.
Elena BelloniDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Sant'Andrea Hospital, 00189 Rome, Italy.
Alessio LucariniDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Sant'Andrea Hospital, 00189 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9644-740X
Paolo AurelloDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Sant'Andrea Hospital, 00189 Rome, Italy.
Francesco D'AngeloDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Sant'Andrea Hospital, 00189 Rome, Italy.
Salomone di SaverioDepartment of Surgery, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5685-5022
Alessandro FancelluDepartment of Medical, Surgical and Experimental Sciences, University of Sassari, 07100 Sassari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3997-8183
Giovanni RamacciatoDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Sant'Andrea Hospital, 00189 Rome, Italy.
Sapienza University of Rome · ITCambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Sassari · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMajor vascular invasion represents one of the most frequent reasons to consider pancreatic adenocarcinomas unresectable, although in the last decades, demolitive surgeries such as distal pancreatectomy with celiac axis resection (DP-CAR) have become a therapeutical option.

methodsA meta-analysis of studies comparing DP-CAR and standard DP in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma was conducted. Moreover, a systematic review of studies analyzing oncological, postoperative and survival outcomes of DP-CAR was conducted.

resultsTwenty-four articles were selected for the systematic review, whereas eleven were selected for the meta-analysis, for a total of 1077 patients. Survival outcomes between the two groups were similar in terms of 1 year overall survival (OS) (odds ratio (OR) 0.67, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.34 to 1.31,

conclusionsDP-CAR was not associated with higher mortality compared to standard DP; however, overall morbidity was higher. Celiac axis involvement should no longer be considered a strict contraindication to surgery in patients with locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Considering the different baseline tumor characteristics, DP-CAR may need to be compared with palliative therapies instead of standard DP.

Indexed as

borderline resectablepancreatic cancervascular reconstruction

Identifiers

PMID33921838
PMCPMC8073522
OpenAlexW3155529676

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.