Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33921782›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2021

EFAR-MMLA: An Evaluation Framework to Assess and Report Generalizability of Machine Learning Models in MMLA.

Pankaj Chejara, Luis P Prieto, Adolfo Ruiz-Calleja, María Jesús Rodríguez-Triana, Shashi Kant Shankar, Reet Kasepalu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. From Sensor Data to Educational Insights.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Pankaj ChejaraSchool of Digital Technologies, Tallinn University, 10120 Tallinn, Estonia.ORCID 0000-0002-7630-5789
Luis P PrietoSchool of Educational Sciences, Tallinn University, 10120 Tallinn, Estonia.ORCID 0000-0002-0057-0682
Adolfo Ruiz-CallejaGSIC-EMIC Group, University of Valladolid, 47011 Valladolid, Spain.
María Jesús Rodríguez-TrianaSchool of Digital Technologies, Tallinn University, 10120 Tallinn, Estonia.ORCID 0000-0001-8639-1257
Shashi Kant ShankarSchool of Digital Technologies, Tallinn University, 10120 Tallinn, Estonia.ORCID 0000-0001-8266-3681
Reet KasepaluSchool of Educational Sciences, Tallinn University, 10120 Tallinn, Estonia.

Funding

European Union via the European Regional Development Fund, Regional Council of Education of Castile and Léon, National Research Agency of the Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities 669074, 731685, VA257P18, TIN2017-85179-C3-2-R
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multimodal Learning Analytics (MMLA) researchers are progressively employing machine learning (ML) techniques to develop predictive models to improve learning and teaching practices. These predictive models are often evaluated for their generalizability using methods from the ML domain, which do not take into account MMLA's educational nature. Furthermore, there is a lack of systematization in model evaluation in MMLA, which is also reflected in the heterogeneous reporting of the evaluation results. To overcome these issues, this paper proposes an evaluation framework to assess and report the generalizability of ML models in MMLA (EFAR-MMLA). To illustrate the usefulness of EFAR-MMLA, we present a case study with two datasets, each with audio and log data collected from a classroom during a collaborative learning session. In this case study, regression models are developed for collaboration quality and its sub-dimensions, and their generalizability is evaluated and reported. The framework helped us to systematically detect and report that the models achieved better performance when evaluated using hold-out or cross-validation but quickly degraded when evaluated across different student groups and learning contexts. The framework helps to open up a "wicked problem" in MMLA research that remains fuzzy (i.e., the generalizability of ML models), which is critical to both accumulating knowledge in the research community and demonstrating the practical relevance of these techniques.

Indexed as

evaluation frameworkface-to-face collaborationgeneralizabilitymachine learningMMLAMultimodal Learning Analyticsreporting

Identifiers

PMID33921782
PMCPMC8073259

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.