ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2021
A Novel Multi-Sensor Fusion Algorithm Based on Uncertainty Analysis.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Architecture-Level Event-Oriented Frontend for Heterogeneous Sensor Inference in Photonic Stochastic Systems.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Application of Microwave Transmission Sensors for Water Cut Metering under Varying Salinity Conditions: Device, Algorithm and Uncertainty Analysis.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Vulnerable Road Users and Connected Autonomous Vehicles Interaction: A Survey.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
During the research and development of multiphase flowmeters, errors are often used to evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of different devices and algorithms, whilst an in-depth uncertainty analysis is seldom carried out. However, limited information is sometimes revealed from the errors, especially when the test data are scant, and this makes an in-depth comparison of different algorithms impossible. In response to this problem, three combinations of sensing methods are implemented, which are the "capacitance and cross-correlation", the "cross-correlation and differential pressure" and the "differential pressure and capacitance" respectively. The analytical expressions of the gas/liquid flowrate and the associated standard uncertainty have been derived, and Monte Carlo simulations are carried out to determine the desired probability density function. The results obtained through these two approaches are basically the same. Thereafter, the sources of uncertainty for each combination are traced and their respective variations with flowrates are analyzed. Further, the relationship between errors and uncertainty is studied, which demonstrates that the two uncertainty analysis approaches can be a powerful tool for error prediction. Finally, a novel multi-sensor fusion algorithm based on the uncertainty analysis is proposed. This algorithm can minimize the standard uncertainty over the whole flowrate range and thus reduces the measurement error.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.