ReviewGenes2021
Karyotype Aberrations in Action: The Evolution of Cancer Genomes and the Tumor Microenvironment.
Review in Genes, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Paradoxical Role for Somatic Chromosomal Mosaicism and Chromosome Instability in Cancer: Theoretical and Technological Aspects.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024Review
- Tracking circulating PD-L1-positive cells to monitor the outcome of patients with gastric cancer receiving anti-HER2 plus anti-PD-1 therapy.Human cell · 2024Article
- Inferring chromosomal instability from copy number aberrations as a measure of chromosomal instability across human cancers.Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2023Article
- High-Frequency Dielectrophoresis Reveals That Distinct Bio-Electric Signatures of Colorectal Cancer Cells Depend on Ploidy and Nuclear Volume.Micromachines · 2023Article
- Inferring chromosomal instability from copy number aberrations as a measure of chromosomal instability across human cancers.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- miR-186 induces tetraploidy in arsenic exposed human keratinocytes.Ecotoxicology and environmental safety · 2023Article
- Computational Biology Helps Understand How Polyploid Giant Cancer Cells Drive Tumor Success.Genes · 2023Review
- "Pulsed Hypoxia" Gradually Reprograms Breast Cancer Fibroblasts into Pro-Tumorigenic Cells via Mesenchymal-Epithelial Transition.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Article
- Constitutive Activation of the Tumor Suppressor p53 in Hepatocytes Paradoxically Promotes Non-Cell Autonomous Liver Carcinogenesis.Cancer research · 2022Article
- Whole-Genome Duplication Shapes the Aneuploidy Landscape of Human Cancers.Cancer research · 2022Article
- Machine Learning: A New Prospect in Multi-Omics Data Analysis of Cancer.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Review
- Cell fusion as a link between the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, COVID-19 complications, and vaccine side effects.Oncotarget · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cancer is a disease of cellular evolution. For this cellular evolution to take place, a population of cells must contain functional heterogeneity and an assessment of this heterogeneity in the form of natural selection. Cancer cells from advanced malignancies are genomically and functionally very different compared to the healthy cells from which they evolved. Genomic alterations include aneuploidy (numerical and structural changes in chromosome content) and polyploidy (e.g., whole genome doubling), which can have considerable effects on cell physiology and phenotype. Likewise, conditions in the tumor microenvironment are spatially heterogeneous and vastly different than in healthy tissues, resulting in a number of environmental niches that play important roles in driving the evolution of tumor cells. While a number of studies have documented abnormal conditions of the tumor microenvironment and the cellular consequences of aneuploidy and polyploidy, a thorough overview of the interplay between karyotypically abnormal cells and the tissue and tumor microenvironments is not available. Here, we examine the evidence for how this interaction may unfold during tumor evolution. We describe a bidirectional interplay in which aneuploid and polyploid cells alter and shape the microenvironment in which they and their progeny reside; in turn, this microenvironment modulates the rate of genesis for new karyotype aberrations and selects for cells that are most fit under a given condition. We conclude by discussing the importance of this interaction for tumor evolution and the possibility of leveraging our understanding of this interplay for cancer therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.