Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33921202›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Blindness and the Reliability of Downwards Sensors to Avoid Obstacles: A Study with the EyeCane.

Maxime Bleau, Samuel Paré, Ismaël Djerourou, Daniel R Chebat, Ron Kupers, Maurice Ptito

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Maxime BleauÉcole D'optométrie, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC H3T 1P1, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-5117-9368
Samuel ParéÉcole D'optométrie, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC H3T 1P1, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-3960-8497
Ismaël DjerourouÉcole D'optométrie, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC H3T 1P1, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-7108-7703
Daniel R ChebatVisual and Cognitive Neuroscience Laboratory (VCN Lab.), Department of Psychology, Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities, Ariel University, Ari'el 40700, Israel.ORCID 0000-0003-1252-9393
Ron KupersÉcole D'optométrie, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC H3T 1P1, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-7237-4245
Maurice PtitoÉcole D'optométrie, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC H3T 1P1, Canada.

Funding

Canadian Institute of Health Research PJT-9175018
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vision loss has dramatic repercussions on the quality of life of affected people, particularly with respect to their orientation and mobility. Many devices are available to help blind people to navigate in their environment. The EyeCane is a recently developed electronic travel aid (ETA) that is inexpensive and easy to use, allowing for the detection of obstacles lying ahead within a 2 m range. The goal of this study was to investigate the potential of the EyeCane as a primary aid for spatial navigation. Three groups of participants were recruited: early blind, late blind, and sighted. They were first trained with the EyeCane and then tested in a life-size obstacle course with four obstacles types: cube, door, post, and step. Subjects were requested to cross the corridor while detecting, identifying, and avoiding the obstacles. Each participant had to perform 12 runs with 12 different obstacles configurations. All participants were able to learn quickly to use the EyeCane and successfully complete all trials. Amongst the various obstacles, the step appeared to prove the hardest to detect and resulted in more collisions. Although the EyeCane was effective for detecting obstacles lying ahead, its downward sensor did not reliably detect those on the ground, rendering downward obstacles more hazardous for navigation.

Indexed as

Persons with Visual DisabilitiesQuality of LifeBlindnessHumansOrientationReproducibility of ResultsavoidanceblindnesscollisionEyeCanenavigationobstacle detectionsensory substitution

Identifiers

PMID33921202
PMCPMC8070041

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.