Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33921076›Full record

ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Characterisation of the Filler Fraction in CAD/CAM Resin-Based Composites.

Andreas Koenig, Julius Schmidtke, Leonie Schmohl, Sibylle Schneider-Feyrer, Martin Rosentritt, Hieronymus Hoelzig, Gert Kloess, Ketpat Vejjasilpa, Michaela Schulz-Siegmund, Florian Fuchs and 1 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Advances in Dental Restorations: A Comprehensive Review of Machinable and 3D-Printed Ceramic-Reinforced Composites.Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry : official publication of the American Academy of Esthetic Dentistry ... [et al.] · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Andreas KoenigDepartment of Dental Prosthetics and Materials Science, Leipzig University, 04103 Leipzig, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5617-3707
Julius SchmidtkeDepartment of Dental Prosthetics and Materials Science, Leipzig University, 04103 Leipzig, Germany.
Leonie SchmohlDepartment of Dental Prosthetics and Materials Science, Leipzig University, 04103 Leipzig, Germany.
Sibylle Schneider-FeyrerDepartment of Prosthetic Dentistry, Regensburg University Medical Centre, 93042 Regensburg, Germany.
Martin RosentrittDepartment of Prosthetic Dentistry, Regensburg University Medical Centre, 93042 Regensburg, Germany.
Hieronymus HoelzigInstitute of Mineralogy, Crystallography and Materials Science, Leipzig University, 04275 Leipzig, Germany.
Gert KloessInstitute of Mineralogy, Crystallography and Materials Science, Leipzig University, 04275 Leipzig, Germany.
Ketpat VejjasilpaInstitute of Pharmacy, Pharmaceutical Technology, Leipzig University, 04317 Leipzig, Germany.
Michaela Schulz-SiegmundInstitute of Pharmacy, Pharmaceutical Technology, Leipzig University, 04317 Leipzig, Germany.
Florian FuchsDepartment of Dental Prosthetics and Materials Science, Leipzig University, 04103 Leipzig, Germany.
Sebastian HahnelDepartment of Dental Prosthetics and Materials Science, Leipzig University, 04103 Leipzig, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The performance of dental resin-based composites (RBCs) heavily depends on the characteristic properties of the individual filler fraction. As specific information regarding the properties of the filler fraction is often missing, the current study aims to characterize the filler fractions of several contemporary computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) RBCs from a material science point of view. The filler fractions of seven commercially available CAD/CAM RBCs featuring different translucency variants were analysed using Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) with Energy Dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy (EDS), Micro-X-ray Computed Tomography (µXCT), Thermogravimetric Analysis (TG) and X-ray Diffractometry (XRD). All CAD/CAM RBCs investigated included midifill hybrid type filler fractions, and the size of the individual particles was clearly larger than the individual specifications of the manufacturer. The fillers in Shofu Block HC featured a sphericity of ≈0.8, while it was <0.7 in all other RBCs. All RBCs featured only X-ray amorphous phases. However, in Lava Ultimate, zircon crystals with low crystallinity were detected. In some CAD/CAM RBCs, inhomogeneities (X-ray opaque fillers or pores) with a size <80 µm were identified, but the effects were minor in relation to the total volume (<0.01 vol.%). The characteristic parameters of the filler fraction in RBCs are essential for the interpretation of the individual material's mechanical and optical properties.

Indexed as

dental glassesdirect compositesfiller size distributionmicrostructuremicrotomographymicro-X-ray computer tomographyRBCsphericityX-ray diffraction

Identifiers

PMID33921076
PMCPMC8071413

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.