Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33920965›Full record

ReviewViruses2021

The Advantages and Challenges of Using Endolysins in a Clinical Setting.

Ellen Murray, Lorraine A Draper, R Paul Ross, Colin Hill

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Viruses, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 152 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
152citing papers in PubMed
28.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

152 citing papers in PubMed, 247 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Domain shuffling of endolysin LysKB317 to controlBiotechnology reports (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

92 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ellen MurraySchool of Microbiology, University College Cork, T12 YT20 Cork, Ireland.
Lorraine A DraperSchool of Microbiology, University College Cork, T12 YT20 Cork, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-6910-9317
R Paul RossSchool of Microbiology, University College Cork, T12 YT20 Cork, Ireland.
Colin HillSchool of Microbiology, University College Cork, T12 YT20 Cork, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-8527-1445
University College Cork · IE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antibiotic-resistant pathogens are increasingly more prevalent and problematic. Traditional antibiotics are no longer a viable option for dealing with these multidrug-resistant microbes and so new approaches are needed. Bacteriophage-derived proteins such as endolysins could offer one effective solution. Endolysins are bacteriophage-encoded peptidoglycan hydrolases that act to lyse bacterial cells by targeting their cell's wall, particularly in Gram-positive bacteria due to their naturally exposed peptidoglycan layer. These lytic enzymes have received much interest from the scientific community in recent years for their specificity, mode of action, potential for engineering, and lack of resistance mechanisms. Over the past decade, a renewed interest in endolysin therapy has led to a number of successful applications. Recombinant endolysins have been shown to be effective against prominent pathogens such as MRSA,

Indexed as

AnimalsBacteriophagesCell WallEndopeptidasesGram-Positive Bacterial InfectionsHumansPeptidoglycanPhage TherapyendolysinEndopeptidasesPeptidoglycanantibioticsbacteriophageendolysinmultidrug resistancenovel therapy

Identifiers

PMID33920965
PMCPMC8071259
OpenAlexW3152895331

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.