ReviewMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2021
The Art of Designing DNA Nanostructures with CAD Software.
Review in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- A computational framework for designing micron-scale crisscross DNA megastructures.Nature communications · 2026Article
- DNA Origami and Their Application in Biosensors.Biosensors · 2026Review
- Bioinspired reconfigurable cloverleaf DNA origami as a versatile platform for visual molecular detection.RSC advances · 2025Article
- Article
- Generative design-enabled exploration of wireframe DNA origami nanostructures.Nucleic acids research · 2025Article
- Article
- Reconfigurable pH-Responsive DNA Origami Lattices.ACS nano · 2023Article
- Lab-on-a-DNA origami: nanoengineered single-molecule platforms.Chemical communications (Cambridge, England) · 2023Review
- Dynamics of DNA Origami Lattices.Bioconjugate chemistry · 2023Review
- Reverse engineering DNA origami nanostructure designs from raw scaffold and staple sequence lists.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2023Article
- A label-free light-scattering method to resolve assembly and disassembly of DNA nanostructures.Biophysical journal · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Since the arrival of DNA nanotechnology nearly 40 years ago, the field has progressed from its beginnings of envisioning rather simple DNA structures having a branched, multi-strand architecture into creating beautifully complex structures comprising hundreds or even thousands of unique strands, with the possibility to exactly control the positions down to the molecular level. While the earliest construction methodologies, such as simple Holliday junctions or tiles, could reasonably be designed on pen and paper in a short amount of time, the advent of complex techniques, such as DNA origami or DNA bricks, require software to reduce the time required and propensity for human error within the design process. Where available, readily accessible design software catalyzes our ability to bring techniques to researchers in diverse fields and it has helped to speed the penetration of methods, such as DNA origami, into a wide range of applications from biomedicine to photonics. Here, we review the historical and current state of CAD software to enable a variety of methods that are fundamental to using structural DNA technology. Beginning with the first tools for predicting sequence-based secondary structure of nucleotides, we trace the development and significance of different software packages to the current state-of-the-art, with a particular focus on programs that are open source.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.