Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33920889›Full record

ReviewMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2021

The Art of Designing DNA Nanostructures with CAD Software.

Martin Glaser, Sourav Deb, Florian Seier, Amay Agrawal, Tim Liedl, Shawn Douglas, Manish K Gupta, David M Smith

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Lab-on-a-DNA origami: nanoengineered single-molecule platforms.Chemical communications (Cambridge, England) · 2023
    Review
  9. Dynamics of DNA Origami Lattices.Bioconjugate chemistry · 2023
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Martin GlaserPeter Debye Institute for Soft Matter Physics, Leipzig University, Linnéstraße 5, 04103 Leipzig, Germany.
Sourav DebDhirubhai Ambani Institute of Information and Communication Technology, Gandhinagar 382 007, India.ORCID 0000-0001-7173-6339
Florian SeierFraunhofer Institute for Cell Therapy and Immunology, Perlickstraße 1, 04103 Leipzig, Germany.
Amay AgrawalFraunhofer Institute for Cell Therapy and Immunology, Perlickstraße 1, 04103 Leipzig, Germany.
Tim LiedlFaculty of Physics and Center for Nanoscience (CeNS), Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Geschwister-Scholl-Platz 1, 80539 München, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0040-0173
Shawn DouglasDepartment of Cellular and Molecular Pharmacology, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA.
Manish K GuptaDhirubhai Ambani Institute of Information and Communication Technology, Gandhinagar 382 007, India.ORCID 0000-0001-7067-8085
David M SmithPeter Debye Institute for Soft Matter Physics, Leipzig University, Linnéstraße 5, 04103 Leipzig, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8344-850X

Funding

Department of Science and Technology DST/INT/DAAD/P- 574 14/2019Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst 57453411Ministerium für Wirtschaft, Arbeit und Wohnungsbau Baden-Württemberg 231201553National Science Foundation DBI-1548297Office of Naval Research N00014-17-1-2627
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since the arrival of DNA nanotechnology nearly 40 years ago, the field has progressed from its beginnings of envisioning rather simple DNA structures having a branched, multi-strand architecture into creating beautifully complex structures comprising hundreds or even thousands of unique strands, with the possibility to exactly control the positions down to the molecular level. While the earliest construction methodologies, such as simple Holliday junctions or tiles, could reasonably be designed on pen and paper in a short amount of time, the advent of complex techniques, such as DNA origami or DNA bricks, require software to reduce the time required and propensity for human error within the design process. Where available, readily accessible design software catalyzes our ability to bring techniques to researchers in diverse fields and it has helped to speed the penetration of methods, such as DNA origami, into a wide range of applications from biomedicine to photonics. Here, we review the historical and current state of CAD software to enable a variety of methods that are fundamental to using structural DNA technology. Beginning with the first tools for predicting sequence-based secondary structure of nucleotides, we trace the development and significance of different software packages to the current state-of-the-art, with a particular focus on programs that are open source.

Indexed as

DNANanostructuresNanotechnologyNucleic Acid ConformationSoftwareDNACAD softwareDNA bricksDNA nanotechnologyDNA origamiDNA tilesnanofabricationself-assemblysimulation

Identifiers

PMID33920889
PMCPMC8071251

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.