Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33920824›Full record

ReviewCancers2021

Current Intraoperative Imaging Techniques to Improve Surgical Resection of Laryngeal Cancer: A Systematic Review.

Lorraine J Lauwerends, Hidde A Galema, José A U Hardillo, Aniel Sewnaik, Dominiek Monserez, Pieter B A A van Driel, Cornelis Verhoef, Robert J Baatenburg de Jong, Denise E Hilling, Stijn Keereweer

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Autofluorescence Image-Guided Endoscopy in the Management of Upper Aerodigestive Tract Tumors.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lorraine J LauwerendsDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-9704-7806
Hidde A GalemaDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-7777-0754
José A U HardilloDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-5580-5613
Aniel SewnaikDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Dominiek MonserezDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-7117-7300
Pieter B A A van DrielDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Isala Hospital, 8025 AB Zwolle, The Netherlands.
Cornelis VerhoefDepartment of Surgical Oncology and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-9980-8613
Robert J Baatenburg de JongDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-7236-264X
Denise E HillingDepartment of Surgical Oncology and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-5875-6164
Stijn KeereweerDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-4665-6868
Erasmus MC Cancer Institute · NLIsala · NL

Funding

Erasmus MC Vriendenfonds n/aKWF Kankerbestrijding 12175
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Laryngeal cancer is a prevalent head and neck malignancy, with poor prognosis and low survival rates for patients with advanced disease. Treatment consists of unimodal therapy through surgery or radiotherapy in early staged tumors, while advanced stage tumors are generally treated with multimodal chemoradiotherapy or (total) laryngectomy followed by radiotherapy. Still, the recurrence rate for advanced laryngeal cancer is between 25 and 50%. In order to improve surgical resection of laryngeal cancer and reduce local recurrence rates, various intraoperative optical imaging techniques have been investigated. In this systematic review, we identify these technologies, evaluating the current state and future directions of optical imaging for this indication. Narrow-band imaging (NBI) and autofluorescence (AF) are established tools for early detection of laryngeal cancer. Nonetheless, their intraoperative utility is limited by an intrinsic inability to image beyond the (sub-)mucosa. Likewise, contact endoscopy (CE) and optical coherence tomography (OCT) are technically cumbersome and only useful for mucosal margin assessment. Research on fluorescence imaging (FLI) for this application is sparse, dealing solely with nonspecific fluorescent agents. Evidently, the imaging modalities that have been investigated thus far are generally unsuitable for deep margin assessment. We discuss two optical imaging techniques that can overcome these limitations and suggest how they can be used to achieve adequate margins in laryngeal cancer at all stages.

Indexed as

fluorescence imagingintraoperative imaginglaryngeal cancernarrow-band imagingRaman spectroscopysurgical margins

Identifiers

PMID33920824
PMCPMC8071167
OpenAlexW3156806965

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.