Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33920817›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2021

Autophagy in Plant Abiotic Stress Management.

Hong Chen, Jiangli Dong, Tao Wang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. From Division to Death: Metabolomic Analysis ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Plant Heterotrophic Cultures: No Food, No Growth.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Vacuolar Processing Enzymes in Plant Programmed Cell Death and Autophagy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hong ChenCollege of Grassland Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China.ORCID 0000-0001-8673-6059
Jiangli DongState Key Laboratory of Agrobiotechnology, College of Biological Sciences, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China.ORCID 0000-0003-2643-6358
Tao WangState Key Laboratory of Agrobiotechnology, College of Biological Sciences, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China.

Funding

the China National Postdoctoral Program for Innovative Talents BX20190371the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation 2019M660876the Project for Extramural Scientists of the State Key Laboratory of Agrobiotechnology 2020SKLAB6-15
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plants can be considered an open system. Throughout their life cycle, plants need to exchange material, energy and information with the outside world. To improve their survival and complete their life cycle, plants have developed sophisticated mechanisms to maintain cellular homeostasis during development and in response to environmental changes. Autophagy is an evolutionarily conserved self-degradative process that occurs ubiquitously in all eukaryotic cells and plays many physiological roles in maintaining cellular homeostasis. In recent years, an increasing number of studies have shown that autophagy can be induced not only by starvation but also as a cellular response to various abiotic stresses, including oxidative, salt, drought, cold and heat stresses. This review focuses mainly on the role of autophagy in plant abiotic stress management.

Indexed as

AutophagyStress, PhysiologicalModels, BiologicalPlantsSaccharomyces cerevisiaeabiotic stressautophagyautophagy-related genesselective autophagy

Identifiers

PMID33920817
PMCPMC8071135

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.