Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33920724›Full record

ReviewMicroorganisms2021

Current Status of Putative Animal Sources of SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Humans: Wildlife, Domestic Animals and Pets.

Max Maurin, Florence Fenollar, Oleg Mediannikov, Bernard Davoust, Christian Devaux, Didier Raoult

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Microorganisms, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Improving the ONE HEALTH approach: a lesson from SARS-CoV-2 pandemic.Journal of preventive medicine and hygiene · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Quantitative Risk Evaluation of Adventitious Agents in Heparin.TH open : companion journal to thrombosis and haemostasis · 2023
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. UsingExpert opinion on drug discovery · 2022
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Max MaurinUniversity Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, Grenoble INP, CHU Grenoble Alpes, TIMC-IMAG, 38000 Grenoble, France.ORCID 0000-0003-4156-3208
Florence FenollarIHU-Méditerranée Infection, 13005 Marseille, France.
Oleg MediannikovIHU-Méditerranée Infection, 13005 Marseille, France.ORCID 0000-0001-6039-2008
Bernard DavoustIHU-Méditerranée Infection, 13005 Marseille, France.
Christian DevauxIHU-Méditerranée Infection, 13005 Marseille, France.
Didier RaoultIHU-Méditerranée Infection, 13005 Marseille, France.
Aix-Marseille Université · FRCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRInstitut polytechnique de Grenoble · FR

Funding

Agence Nationale de la Recherche Investments for the Future, Méditerranée-Infection 10-IAHU-03
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

SARS-CoV-2 is currently considered to have emerged from a bat coronavirus reservoir. However, the real natural cycle of this virus remains to be elucidated. Moreover, the COVID-19 pandemic has led to novel opportunities for SARS-CoV-2 transmission between humans and susceptible animal species. In silico and in vitro evaluation of the interactions between the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein and eucaryotic angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) receptor have tentatively predicted susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2 infection of several animal species. Although useful, these data do not always correlate with in vivo data obtained in experimental models or during natural infections. Other host biological properties may intervene such as the body temperature, level of receptor expression, co-receptor, restriction factors, and genetic background. The spread of SARS-CoV-2 also depends on the extent and duration of viral shedding in the infected host as well as population density and behaviour (group living and grooming). Overall, current data indicate that the most at-risk interactions between humans and animals for COVID-19 infection are those involving certain mustelids (such as minks and ferrets), rodents (such as hamsters), lagomorphs (especially rabbits), and felines (including cats). Therefore, special attention should be paid to the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection associated with pets.

Indexed as

animal reservoirscompanion animalsCOVID-19domestic animalsmodes of transmissionpetsSARS-CoV-2wild animalszoonosis

Identifiers

PMID33920724
PMCPMC8072559
OpenAlexW3153518043

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.