Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33920674›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

Does Head Orientation Influence 3D Facial Imaging? A Study on Accuracy and Precision of Stereophotogrammetric Acquisition.

Giuditta Battistoni, Diana Cassi, Marisabel Magnifico, Giuseppe Pedrazzi, Marco Di Blasio, Benedetta Vaienti, Alberto Di Blasio

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Giuditta BattistoniSection of Orthodontics, Dental School, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, 43126 Parma, Italy.
Diana CassiDepartment of Surgical, Medical, Dental and Morphological Science with Interest in Transplant Oncological and Regenerative Medicine, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, 41124 Modena, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9076-1337
Marisabel MagnificoSection of Orthodontics, Dental School, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, 43126 Parma, Italy.
Giuseppe PedrazziDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, Unit of Neuroscience, Interdepartmental Centre of Robust Statistics (Ro.S.A.), University of Parma, 43126 Parma, Italy.
Marco Di BlasioSection of Orthodontics, Dental School, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, 43126 Parma, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2629-9381
Benedetta VaientiSection of Orthodontics, Dental School, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, 43126 Parma, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5556-2807
Alberto Di BlasioSection of Orthodontics, Dental School, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, 43126 Parma, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0219-6946
University of Parma · ITUniversity of Modena and Reggio Emilia · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study investigates the reliability and precision of anthropometric measurements collected from 3D images and acquired under different conditions of head rotation. Various sources of error were examined, and the equivalence between craniofacial data generated from alternative head positions was assessed. 3D captures of a mannequin head were obtained with a stereophotogrammetric system (Face Shape 3D MaxiLine). Image acquisition was performed with no rotations and with various pitch, roll, and yaw angulations. On 3D images, 14 linear distances were measured. Various indices were used to quantify error magnitude, among them the acquisition error, the mean and the maximum intra- and inter-operator measurement error, repeatability and reproducibility error, the standard deviation, and the standard error of errors. Two one-sided tests (TOST) were performed to assess the equivalence between measurements recorded in different head angulations. The maximum intra-operator error was very low (0.336 mm), closely followed by the acquisition error (0.496 mm). The maximum inter-operator error was 0.532 mm, and the highest degree of error was found in reproducibility (0.890 mm). Anthropometric measurements from alternative acquisition conditions resulted in significantly equivalent TOST, with the exception of Zygion (l)-Tragion (l) and Cheek (l)-Tragion (l) distances measured with pitch angulation compared to no rotation position. Face Shape 3D Maxiline has sufficient accuracy for orthodontic and surgical use. Precision was not altered by head orientation, making the acquisition simpler and not constrained to a critical precision as in 2D photographs.

Indexed as

FacePhotogrammetryHeadImaging, Three-DimensionalReproducibility of Results3D imaginganthropometrydentistry craniofacial morphologyhead positionnon-invasive imagingorthodonticsstereophotogrammetry

Identifiers

PMID33920674
PMCPMC8073202
OpenAlexW3156992482

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.