Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33920531›Full record

ReviewCancers2021

Biomarker-Guided Anti-Egfr Rechallenge Therapy in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.

Davide Ciardiello, Giulia Martini, Vincenzo Famiglietti, Stefania Napolitano, Vincenzo De Falco, Teresa Troiani, Tiziana Pia Latiano, Javier Ros, Elena Elez Fernandez, Pietro Paolo Vitiello and 3 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Davide CiardielloOncologia Medica, Dipartimento di Medicina di Precisione, Università degli Studi della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, 80131 Naples, Italy.
Giulia MartiniOncologia Medica, Dipartimento di Medicina di Precisione, Università degli Studi della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, 80131 Naples, Italy.
Vincenzo FamigliettiOncologia Medica, Dipartimento di Medicina di Precisione, Università degli Studi della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, 80131 Naples, Italy.
Stefania NapolitanoOncologia Medica, Dipartimento di Medicina di Precisione, Università degli Studi della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, 80131 Naples, Italy.
Vincenzo De FalcoOncologia Medica, Dipartimento di Medicina di Precisione, Università degli Studi della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, 80131 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0261-0382
Teresa TroianiOncologia Medica, Dipartimento di Medicina di Precisione, Università degli Studi della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, 80131 Naples, Italy.
Tiziana Pia LatianoOncologia Medica, IRCCS Foundation Ospedale Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza, 71013 San Giovanni Rotondo, Italy
Javier RosOncologia Medica, Dipartimento di Medicina di Precisione, Università degli Studi della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, 80131 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8137-5415
Elena Elez FernandezDepartment of Medical Oncology, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital (HUVH), Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), IOB-Quiron, UVic-UCC, 08035 Barcelona, Spain.
Pietro Paolo VitielloDipartimento di Oncologia, Istituto per la Ricerca sul Cancro (IRCC), Università di Torino, 10060 Candiolo, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4060-7662
Evaristo MaielloOncologia Medica, IRCCS Foundation Ospedale Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza, 71013 San Giovanni Rotondo, Italy
Fortunato CiardielloOncologia Medica, Dipartimento di Medicina di Precisione, Università degli Studi della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, 80131 Naples, Italy.
Erika MartinelliOncologia Medica, Dipartimento di Medicina di Precisione, Università degli Studi della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, 80131 Naples, Italy.
University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" · ITCasa Sollievo della Sofferenza · ITUniversitat de Vic - Universitat Central de Catalunya · ESFondazione Piemontese per la Ricerca sul Cancro Onlus · IT

Funding

Regione Campania Cup 21C17000030007
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The prognosis of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) who progressed to the first and the second lines of treatment is poor. Thus, new therapeutic strategies are needed. During the last years, emerging evidence suggests that retreatment with anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) in the third line of mCRC patients, that have previously obtained clinical benefit by first-line therapy with anti-EGFR MAbs plus chemotherapy, could lead to prolonged survival. The rationale beyond this "rechallenge" strategy is that, after disease progression to first line EGFR-based therapy, a treatment break from anti-EGFR drugs results in

Indexed as

anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodiesmetastatic colorectal cancerrechallenge

Identifiers

PMID33920531
PMCPMC8073594
OpenAlexW3153189337

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.