Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33920462›Full record

ArticleVaccines2021

Intention to Get COVID-19 Vaccinations among Ophthalmology Residents in Poland: A Cross-Sectional Survey.

Joanna Konopińska, Iwona Obuchowska, Łukasz Lisowski, Natalia Dub, Milena Kozera, Marek Rękas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccines, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Ophthalmology Residents: A Narrative Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. The Role and Views of Ophthalmologists During the COVID-19 Pandemic.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2021
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Joanna KonopińskaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Medical University of Bialystok, 15-276 Bialystok, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-9088-6938
Iwona ObuchowskaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Medical University of Bialystok, 15-276 Bialystok, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-8164-3782
Łukasz LisowskiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Medical University of Bialystok, 15-276 Bialystok, Poland.
Natalia DubDepartment of Ophthalmology, Medical University of Bialystok, 15-276 Bialystok, Poland.
Milena KozeraDepartment of Ophthalmology, Military Institute of Medicine, 04-141 Warsaw, Poland.
Marek RękasDepartment of Ophthalmology, Military Institute of Medicine, 04-141 Warsaw, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the acceptability of coronavirus disease of 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination among ophthalmology residents in Poland. An online, self-administered, anonymous survey was distributed among Polish ophthalmology residents in early 2021. Of 126 residents who completed the survey, 71.4% indicated that they would get vaccinated, 17.5% were unsure, and 11.1% would refuse vaccination. Married respondents with children (

Indexed as

COVID-19 vaccineophthalmology residentsPolandvaccine acceptance and hesitancy

Identifiers

PMID33920462
PMCPMC8070351

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.