Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33920380›Full record

ReviewAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2021

Humane Slaughter of Edible Decapod Crustaceans.

Francesca Conte, Eva Voslarova, Vladimir Vecerek, Robert William Elwood, Paolo Coluccio, Michela Pugliese, Annamaria Passantino

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Considerations for implementing regulation of decapods in science.Animal welfare (South Mimms, England) · 2024
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Non-Invasive Methods for Assessing the Welfare of Farmed White-Leg Shrimp (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Francesca ConteDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, University of Messina, Polo Universitario Annunziata, 981 68 Messina, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5020-9070
Eva VoslarovaDepartment of Animal Protection and Welfare and Veterinary Public Health, Faculty of Veterinary Hygiene and Ecology, University of Veterinary Sciences Brno, 612 42 Brno, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-4334-2487
Vladimir VecerekDepartment of Animal Protection and Welfare and Veterinary Public Health, Faculty of Veterinary Hygiene and Ecology, University of Veterinary Sciences Brno, 612 42 Brno, Czech Republic.
Robert William ElwoodSchool of Biological Sciences, Queen's University, Belfast BT9 5DL, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6932-8691
Paolo ColuccioDepartment of Neurosciences, Psychology, Drug Research and Child Health (NEUROFARBA), University of Florence-Viale Pieraccini, 6-50139 Firenze, Italy.
Michela PuglieseDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, University of Messina, Polo Universitario Annunziata, 981 68 Messina, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0440-5457
Annamaria PassantinoDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, University of Messina, Polo Universitario Annunziata, 981 68 Messina, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1701-3636

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vast numbers of crustaceans are produced by aquaculture and caught in fisheries to meet the increasing demand for seafood and freshwater crustaceans. Simultaneously, the public is increasingly concerned about current methods employed in their handling and killing. Recent evidence has shown that decapod crustaceans probably have the capacity to suffer because they show responses consistent with pain and have a relatively complex cognitive capacity. For these reasons, they should receive protection. Despite the large numbers of crustaceans transported and slaughtered, legislation protecting their welfare, by using agreed, standardized methods, is lacking. We review various stunning and killing systems proposed for crustaceans, and assess welfare concerns. We suggest the use of methods least likely to cause suffering and call for the implementation of welfare guidelines covering the slaughter of these economically important animals.

Indexed as

Decapodalegislationslaughtering techniquesstunningwelfare

Identifiers

PMID33920380
PMCPMC8069407

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.