Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33920247›Full record

ArticleCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.)2021

Satisfaction among Cancer Patients Undergoing Radiotherapy during the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Institutional Experience.

Vanessa Di Lalla, Haley Patrick, Nicolas Siriani-Ayoub, John Kildea, Tarek Hijal, Joanne Alfieri

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Experiences of patients and providers while using telemedicine in cancer care during COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative literature.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Patient experience in a radiation therapy department pre- and during the COVID-19 pandemic.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Patient reported experiences of Swedish patients being investigated for cancer during the Covid-19 pandemic.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Vanessa Di LallaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC H4A 3J1, Canada.
Haley PatrickDepartment of Radiation Oncology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC H4A 3J1, Canada.
Nicolas Siriani-AyoubDepartment of Radiation Oncology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC H4A 3J1, Canada.
John KildeaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC H4A 3J1, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-7084-1425
Tarek HijalDepartment of Radiation Oncology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC H4A 3J1, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-9341-1735
Joanne AlfieriDepartment of Radiation Oncology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC H4A 3J1, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-3829-9250

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has shifted oncology practices to prioritize patient safety while maintaining necessary treatment delivery. We obtained patient feedback on pandemic-based practices in our radiotherapy department to improve quality of patient care and amend policies as needed. We developed a piloted questionnaire which quantitatively and qualitatively assessed patients' pandemic-related concerns and satisfaction with specific elements of their care. Adult patients who were treated at our Centre between 23 March and 31 May 2020, had initial consultation via telemedicine, and received at least five outpatient fractions of radiotherapy were invited to complete the survey by telephone or online. Relative frequencies of categorical and ordinal responses were then calculated. Fifty-three (48%) out of 110 eligible patients responded: 32 patients by phone and 21 patients online. Eighteen participants (34%) admitted to feeling anxious about hospital appointments, and only five (9%) reported treatment delays. Forty-eight patients (91%) reported satisfaction with their initial telemedicine appointment. The majority of patients indicated that healthcare workers took appropriate precautions, making them feel safe. Overall, all 53 patients (100%) reported being satisfied with their treatment experience during the pandemic. Patient feedback is needed to provide the highest quality of patient care as we adapt to the current reality.

Indexed as

Surveys and QuestionnairesAdolescentAdultAgedCOVID-19Cross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMedical OncologyMiddle AgedNeoplasmsPandemicsPatient SatisfactionRadiation OncologySARS-CoV-2COVID-19pandemic-based practicespatient experiencequality of careradiation oncology

Identifiers

PMID33920247
PMCPMC8167586

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.