Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33920135›Full record

ReviewCancers2021

A Systematic Review of the Use of Circulating Cell-Free DNA Dynamics to Monitor Response to Treatment in Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients.

Elisabeth M Jongbloed, Teoman Deger, Stefan Sleijfer, John W M Martens, Agnes Jager, Saskia M Wilting

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Elisabeth M JongbloedDepartment of Medical Oncology, Erasmus University MC Cancer Institute, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Teoman DegerDepartment of Medical Oncology, Erasmus University MC Cancer Institute, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Stefan SleijferDepartment of Medical Oncology, Erasmus University MC Cancer Institute, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
John W M MartensDepartment of Medical Oncology, Erasmus University MC Cancer Institute, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Agnes JagerDepartment of Medical Oncology, Erasmus University MC Cancer Institute, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Saskia M WiltingDepartment of Medical Oncology, Erasmus University MC Cancer Institute, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-2838-841X

Funding

KWF Kankerbestrijding 12039
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Monitoring treatment response in metastatic breast cancer currently consists mainly of radiological and clinical assessments. These methods have high inter-observer variation, suboptimal sensitivity to determine response to treatment and give little insight into the biological characteristics of the tumor. Assessing circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) over time could be employed to address these limitations. Several ways to quantify and characterize ctDNA exist, based on somatic mutations, copy number variations, methylation, and global circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) fragment sizes and concentrations. These methods are being explored and technically validated, but to date none of these methods are applied clinically. We systematically reviewed the literature on the use of quantitative ctDNA measurements over time to monitor response to systemic therapy in patients with metastatic breast cancer. Cochrane, Embase, PubMed and Google Scholar databases were searched to find studies focusing on the use of cfDNA to longitudinally monitor treatment response in advanced breast cancer patients until October 2020. This resulted in a total of 33 studies which met the inclusion criteria. These studies were heterogeneous in (pre-)processing procedures, applied techniques and design. An association between ctDNA and treatment response was found in most of the included studies, independent of the applied assay. To implement ctDNA-based response monitoring into daily clinical practice for metastatic breast cancer patients, sample (pre-) processing procedures need to be standardized and large prospectively collected sample cohorts with well annotated clinical follow-up are required to establish its clinical validity.

Indexed as

circulating tumor DNAliquid biopsiesmetastatic breast cancertreatment response

Identifiers

PMID33920135
PMCPMC8069506

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.