Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33920023›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2021

Quality of Life, Postoperative Pain, and Lymph Node Dissection in a Robotic Approach Compared to VATS and OPEN for Early Stage Lung Cancer.

Pierluigi Novellis, Patrick Maisonneuve, Elisa Dieci, Emanuele Voulaz, Edoardo Bottoni, Sara Di Stefano, Michela Solinas, Alberto Testori, Umberto Cariboni, Marco Alloisio and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Does Robotic Segmentectomy Improve Long-Term Outcomes in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer?European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Pierluigi NovellisDivision of Thoracic Surgery, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, 20132 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6087-3901
Patrick MaisonneuveDivision of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5309-4704
Elisa DieciDivision of Thoracic Surgery, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, 20132 Milan, Italy.
Emanuele VoulazDivision of Thoracic and General Surgery, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, IRCCS, Rozzano, 20089 Milan, Italy.
Edoardo BottoniDivision of Thoracic and General Surgery, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, IRCCS, Rozzano, 20089 Milan, Italy.
Sara Di StefanoDivision of Thoracic and General Surgery, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, IRCCS, Rozzano, 20089 Milan, Italy.
Michela SolinasThoracic Surgery Unit, New Hospital of Legnano, ASST Ovest, 20025 Milan, Italy.
Alberto TestoriDivision of Thoracic and General Surgery, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, IRCCS, Rozzano, 20089 Milan, Italy.
Umberto CariboniDivision of Thoracic and General Surgery, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, IRCCS, Rozzano, 20089 Milan, Italy.
Marco AlloisioDivision of Thoracic and General Surgery, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, IRCCS, Rozzano, 20089 Milan, Italy.
Giulia VeronesiDivision of Thoracic Surgery, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, 20132 Milan, Italy.
Humanitas University · ITVita-Salute San Raffaele University · ITAzienda Ospedaliera Ospedale Civile di Legnano · ITEuropean Institute of Oncology · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We compare the perioperative course, postoperative pain, and quality-of-life (QOL) in patients undergoing anatomic resections of early-stage lung cancer by means of robotic surgery (RATS), video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS), or muscle-sparing thoracotomy (OPEN); 169 consecutive patients with known/suspected lung cancer, candidates to anatomic resection, were enrolled in a single-center prospective study from April 2016 to December 2018. EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-LC13 scores were obtained preoperatively and, at three time points, postoperatively. RATS and VATS groups were matched for ASA scores, while RATS and open surgery were matched for gender, ASA score, cancer stage, and tumor size; 58 patients underwent open surgery, 58 had VATS, and 53 had RATS. Hospital stay was shorter after RATS than OPEN (median 4.5 versus 5;

Indexed as

early stagelung cancerpostoperative painquality of liferobotic surgery

Identifiers

PMID33920023
PMCPMC8071041
OpenAlexW3154016111

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.