Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33920020›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

What Do the Managers Think of Us? The Older-Worker-Perspective of Managers' Attitudes.

Annette Meng, Emil Sundstrup, Lars L Andersen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Annette MengNational Research Centre for the Working Environment, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-7872-7600
Emil SundstrupNational Research Centre for the Working Environment, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Lars L AndersenNational Research Centre for the Working Environment, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-2777-8085
National Research Centre for the Working Environment · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDue to demographic changes, the need to prolong working life has become increasingly salient. Paradoxically, stereotyping and discrimination against workers based on their age can limit possibilities for a long working life. A large body of research has investigated attitudes towards older workers; however, less is known about differences across occupational groups as well gender differences.

aimTo compare perceptions of the managers' perceptions of older workers between employees from mainly seated work and mainly physical work as well as men and women.

methodData from 11,444 workers aged 50+ from the baseline questionnaire survey in the SeniorWorkingLife study were analyzed.

resultsAcross all groups, a larger proportion of the respondents indicated that their managers had more positive than negative perceptions of older workers. Respondents from the International Standard Classification of Occupations (ISCO) group 5-9 (mainly physical work) and women were less likely to point at both positive and negative perceptions than the ISCO group 14 (mainly seated work) and men, respectively.

conclusionsThe results indicate that there are differences between those with mainly physical and mainly seated work as well as gender differences. More research is warranted to explore the nature of these differences and, in particular, attitudes towards older female and male workers, respectively.

Indexed as

AttitudeOccupationsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPhysical ExaminationStereotypingSurveys and Questionnairesageismage stereotypesaging at workretaining older workerssocial psychologythe SeniorWorkingLife study

Identifiers

PMID33920020
PMCPMC8070998
OpenAlexW3154845755

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.