ReviewJournal of personalized medicine2021
Knowledge Graphs for COVID-19: An Exploratory Review of the Current Landscape.
Review in Journal of personalized medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.
- Graph databases in systems biology: a systematic review.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2024Pooled it
- Liver cancer knowledge graph construction based on dynamic entity replacement and masking strategies RoBERTa-wwm-large-BiLSTM-CRF model with clinical Chinese EMRs.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2025Article
- Using artificial intelligence and predictive modelling to enable learning healthcare systems (LHS) for pandemic preparedness.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024Review
- Data-Driven Strain Sensor Design Based on a Knowledge Graph Framework.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Doubts and concerns about COVID-19 uncertainties on imaging data, clinical score, and outcomes.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2023Article
- Lessons learned to enable question answering on knowledge graphs extracted from scientific publications: A case study on the coronavirus literature.Journal of biomedical informatics · 2023Article
- Knowledge4COVID-19: A semantic-based approach for constructing a COVID-19 related knowledge graph from various sources and analyzing treatments' toxicities.Web semantics (Online) · 2023Article
- Knowledge graph empowerment from knowledge learning to graduation requirements achievement.PloS one · 2023Article
- COVID-19 advising application development for Apple devices (iOS).PeerJ. Computer science · 2023Article
- The Role of Natural Language Processing during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Health Applications, Opportunities, and Challenges.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSearching through the COVID-19 research literature to gain actionable clinical insight is a formidable task, even for experts. The usefulness of this corpus in terms of improving patient care is tied to the ability to see the big picture that emerges when the studies are seen in conjunction rather than in isolation. When the answer to a search query requires linking together multiple pieces of information across documents, simple keyword searches are insufficient. To answer such complex information needs, an innovative artificial intelligence (AI) technology named a knowledge graph (KG) could prove to be effective.
methodsWe conducted an exploratory literature review of KG applications in the context of COVID-19. The search term used was "covid-19 knowledge graph". In addition to PubMed, the first five pages of search results for Google Scholar and Google were considered for inclusion. Google Scholar was used to include non-peer-reviewed or non-indexed articles such as pre-prints and conference proceedings. Google was used to identify companies or consortiums active in this domain that have not published any literature, peer-reviewed or otherwise.
resultsOur search yielded 34 results on PubMed and 50 results each on Google and Google Scholar. We found KGs being used for facilitating literature search, drug repurposing, clinical trial mapping, and risk factor analysis.
conclusionsOur synopses of these works make a compelling case for the utility of this nascent field of research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.