ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2021
Facilitations and Hurdles of Genetic Testing in Neuromuscular Disorders.
Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Zebra in Horse's Clothing: Rethinking the Diagnosis of Rare Diseases.Molecular genetics & genomic medicine · 2025Review
- Genetic spectrum among 2009 Iranian individuals with neuromuscular disorders using next generation sequencing and multiple ligation dependent probe amplification methods.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Genetic Testing for Neuromuscular Diseases.Practical neurology (Fort Washington, Pa.) · 2024Article
- The value of knowing: preferences for genetic testing to diagnose rare muscle diseases.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2024Article
- Understanding Challenges of Genetic Testing on Neuromuscular Disorders from the Parental Lens.Journal of personalized medicine · 2023Article
- Neutral lipid storage disease with myopathy and myotonia associated to pathogenic variants on PNPLA2 and CLCN1 genes: case report.BMC neurology · 2023Article
- Whole exome sequencing highlights rare variants inFrontiers in genetics · 2023Article
- Genetic Testing for Rare Diseases.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Using gene panels in the diagnosis of neuromuscular disorders: A mini-review.Frontiers in neurology · 2022Review
- An integrated approach to the evaluation of patients with asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic hyperCKemia.Muscle & nerve · 2022Article
- Analyzing Modern Biomolecules: The Revolution of Nucleic-Acid Sequencing - Review.Biomolecules · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Neuromuscular disorders (NMDs) comprise a heterogeneous group of disorders that affect about one in every thousand individuals worldwide. The vast majority of NMDs has a genetic cause, with about 600 genes already identified. Application of genetic testing in NMDs can be useful for several reasons: correct diagnostic definition of a proband, extensive familial counselling to identify subjects at risk, and prenatal diagnosis to prevent the recurrence of the disease; furthermore, identification of specific genetic mutations still remains mandatory in some cases for clinical trial enrollment where new gene therapies are now approaching. Even though genetic analysis is catching on in the neuromuscular field, pitfalls and hurdles still remain and they should be taken into account by clinicians, as for example the use of next generation sequencing (NGS) where many single nucleotide variants of "unknown significance" can emerge, complicating the correct interpretation of genotype-phenotype relationship. Finally, when all efforts in terms of molecular analysis have been carried on, a portion of patients affected by NMDs still remain "not genetically defined". In the present review we analyze the evolution of genetic techniques, from Sanger sequencing to NGS, and we discuss "facilitations and hurdles" of genetic testing which must always be balanced by clinicians, in order to ensure a correct diagnostic definition, but taking always into account the benefit that the patient could obtain especially in terms of "therapeutic offer".
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.