Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33919471›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

Dimensions Used in Instruments for QALY Calculation: A Systematic Review.

Moustapha Touré, Christian R C Kouakou, Thomas G Poder

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. How to Assess Health Gains.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Valuation of EQ-5D-5L health states from cancer patients' perspective: a feasibility study.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Cancer population norms using a new value set for the SF-6Dv2 based on the preferences of patients with breast or colorectal cancer in Quebec.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Quality of life of the Canadian population using the VR-12: population norms for health utility values, summary component scores and domain scores.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2024
    Article
  12. Eliciting a value set for the Swedish Capability-Adjusted Life Years instrument (CALY-SWE).Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Moustapha TouréDepartment of Economics, Business School, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC J1K 2R1, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-7640-0356
Christian R C KouakouDepartment of Economics, Business School, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC J1K 2R1, Canada.
Thomas G PoderCentre de Recherche de l'IUSMM, CIUSSS de l'Est de L'île de Montréal, Montréal, QC H1N 3V2, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-7017-096X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Economic assessment is of utmost importance in the healthcare decision-making process. The quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) concept provides a rare opportunity to combine two crucial aspects of health, i.e., mortality and morbidity, into a single index to perform cost-utility comparison. Today, many tools are available to measure morbidity in terms of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and a large literature describes how to use them. Knowing their characteristics and development process is a key point for elaborating, adapting, or selecting the most well-suited instrument for further needs. In this aim, we conducted a systematic review on instruments used for QALY calculation, and 46 studies were selected after searches in four databases: Medline EBSCO, Scopus, ScienceDirect, and PubMed. The search procedure was done to identify all relevant publications up to 18 June 2020. We mainly focused on the type of instrument developed (i.e., generic or specific), the number and the nature of dimensions and levels used, the elicitation method and the model selected to determine utility scores, and the instrument and algorithm validation methods. Results show that studies dealing with the development of specific instruments were mostly motivated by the inappropriateness of generic instruments in their field. For the dimensions' and levels' selection, item response theory, Rasch analysis, and literature review were mostly used. Dimensions and levels were validated by methods like the Loevinger H, the standardised response mean, or discussions with experts in the field. The time trade-off method was the most widely used elicitation method, followed by the visual analogue scale. Random effects regression models were frequently used in determining utility scores.

Indexed as

Health ServicesQuality of LifeCost-Benefit AnalysisPain MeasurementQuality-Adjusted Life Yearseconomic assessmentimpactinstrument developmentQALYutility

Identifiers

PMID33919471
PMCPMC8122477

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.