Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33919326›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2021

Phage Display Screening of Bovine Antibodies to Foot-and-Mouth Disease Virus and Their Application in a Competitive ELISA for Serodiagnosis.

Sukyo Jeong, Hyun Joo Ahn, Kyung Jin Min, Jae Won Byun, Hyun Mi Pyo, Mi Young Park, Bok Kyung Ku, Jinju Nah, Soyoon Ryoo, Sung Hwan Wee and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sukyo JeongSynthetic Biology and Bioengineering Research Center, Korea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Daejeon 34141, Korea.
Hyun Joo AhnSynthetic Biology and Bioengineering Research Center, Korea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Daejeon 34141, Korea.
Kyung Jin MinSynthetic Biology and Bioengineering Research Center, Korea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Daejeon 34141, Korea.
Jae Won ByunFoot-and-Mouth Disease Division, Animal and Plant Quarantine Agency, Gimcheon 39660, Korea.
Hyun Mi PyoFoot-and-Mouth Disease Division, Animal and Plant Quarantine Agency, Gimcheon 39660, Korea.
Mi Young ParkFoot-and-Mouth Disease Division, Animal and Plant Quarantine Agency, Gimcheon 39660, Korea.
Bok Kyung KuFoot-and-Mouth Disease Division, Animal and Plant Quarantine Agency, Gimcheon 39660, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-1892-8910
Jinju NahFoot-and-Mouth Disease Division, Animal and Plant Quarantine Agency, Gimcheon 39660, Korea.
Soyoon RyooFoot-and-Mouth Disease Division, Animal and Plant Quarantine Agency, Gimcheon 39660, Korea.
Sung Hwan WeeFoot-and-Mouth Disease Division, Animal and Plant Quarantine Agency, Gimcheon 39660, Korea.
Sang Jick KimSynthetic Biology and Bioengineering Research Center, Korea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Daejeon 34141, Korea.
Animal and Plant Quarantine Agency · KRKorea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology · KR

Funding

Korea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology Research Initiative ProgramR&D Convergence Program of National Research Council of Science and Technology of Republic of Korea CAP-16-02-KIST
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For serodiagnosis of foot-and-mouth disease virus (FMDV), monoclonal antibody (MAb)-based competitive ELISA (cELISA) is commonly used since it allows simple and reproducible detection of antibody response to FMDV. However, the use of mouse-origin MAb as a detection reagent is questionable, as antibody responses to FMDV in mice may differ in epitope structure and preference from those in natural hosts such as cattle and pigs. To take advantage of natural host-derived antibodies, a phage-displayed scFv library was constructed from FMDV-immune cattle and subjected to two separate pannings against inactivated FMDV type O and A. Subsequent ELISA screening revealed high-affinity scFv antibodies specific to a serotype (O or A) as well as those with pan-serotype specificity. When BvO17, an scFv antibody specific to FMDV type O, was tested as a detection reagent in cELISA, it successfully detected FMDV type O antibodies for both serum samples from vaccinated cattle and virus-challenged pigs with even higher sensitivity than a mouse MAb-based commercial FMDV type O antibody detection kit. These results demonstrate the feasibility of using natural host-derived antibodies such as bovine scFv instead of mouse MAb in cELISA for serological detection of antibody response to FMDV in the susceptible animals.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntibodies, ViralBacteriophagesCattleEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayFoot-and-Mouth DiseaseFoot-and-Mouth Disease VirusSerologic TestsAntibodies, Viralantibodycompetitive ELISAfoot-and-mouth disease virusphage displaytype Atype O

Identifiers

PMID33919326
PMCPMC8122579
OpenAlexW3156123979

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.