Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33919298›Full record

ArticleBrain sciences2021

The Wisconsin Card Sorting Test: Split-Half Reliability Estimates for a Self-Administered Computerized Variant.

Alexander Steinke, Bruno Kopp, Florian Lange

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Cortisol, Anxiety, and TNFα Mediate the Relationship Between BMI and Executive Functions.Stress and health : journal of the International Society for the Investigation of Stress · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. No Evidence of Reliability Across 36 Variations of the Emotional Dot-Probe Task in 9,600 Participants.Clinical psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Alexander SteinkeDepartment of Neurology, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Straße 1, 30625 Hannover, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9892-9189
Bruno KoppDepartment of Neurology, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Straße 1, 30625 Hannover, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8358-1303
Florian LangeBehavioral Engineering Research Group, KU Leuven, Naamsestraat 69, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-8336-5608

Funding

European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme 665501FWO postdoctoral fellowship 12U1221NKarlheinz-Hartmann Stiftung n/a
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Self-administered computerized assessment has the potential to increase the reach of neuropsychological assessment. The present study reports the first split-half reliability estimates for a self-administered computerized variant of the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST), which is considered as a gold standard for the neuropsychological assessment of executive functions. We analyzed data from a large sample of young volunteers (

Indexed as

computerized assessmentexecutive functionsneuropsychological assessmentreliability generalizationsplit-half reliabilityWisconsin Card Sorting Test

Identifiers

PMID33919298
PMCPMC8143331

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.