Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33919264›Full record

Observational studyInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

Hand Hygiene during the Early Neonatal Period: A Mixed-Methods Observational Study in Healthcare Facilities and Households in Rural Cambodia.

Yolisa Nalule, Helen Buxton, Alison Macintyre, Por Ir, Ponnary Pors, Channa Samol, Supheap Leang, Robert Dreibelbis

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Yolisa NaluleDepartment of Disease Control, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London WC1E 7HT, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0456-1476
Helen BuxtonDivision of Psychiatry, University College London, London W1T 7BN, UK.
Alison MacintyrePolicy and Programs Division, WaterAid Australia, Melbourne 3002, Australia.
Por IrNational Institute of Public Health, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
Ponnary PorsWASH and Health Division, WaterAid Cambodia, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
Channa SamolWASH and Health Division, WaterAid Cambodia, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
Supheap LeangNational Institute of Public Health, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
Robert DreibelbisDepartment of Disease Control, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London WC1E 7HT, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9716-0419

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGlobally, infections are the third leading cause of neonatal mortality. Predominant risk factors for facility-born newborns are poor hygiene practices that span both facilities and home environments. Current improvement interventions focus on only one environment and target limited caregivers, primarily birth attendants and mothers. To inform the design of a hand hygiene behavioural change intervention in rural Cambodia, a formative mixed-methods observational study was conducted to investigate the context-specific behaviours and determinants of handwashing among healthcare workers, and maternal and non-maternal caregivers along the early newborn care continuum.

methodsDirect observations of hygiene practices of all individuals providing care to 46 newborns across eight facilities and the associated communities were completed and hand hygiene compliance was assessed. Semi-structured interactive interviews were subsequently conducted with 35 midwives and household members to explore the corresponding cognitive, emotional and environmental factors influencing the observed key hand hygiene behaviours.

resultsHand hygiene opportunities during newborn care were frequent in both settings (n = 1319) and predominantly performed by mothers, fathers and non-parental caregivers. Compliance with hand hygiene protocol across all caregivers, including midwives, was inadequate (0%). Practices were influenced by the lack of accessible physical infrastructure, time, increased workload, low infection risk perception, nurture-related motives, norms and inadequate knowledge.

conclusionsOur findings indicate that an effective intervention in this context should be multi-modal to address the different key behaviour determinants and target a wide range of caregivers.

Indexed as

Hand HygieneCambodiaDelivery of Health CareFemaleHand DisinfectionHealth FacilitiesHumansInfant, NewbornMalebehaviour changeCambodiaformative researchhand hygienehealth facilityhouseholdintervention designneonatal infectionnewborn carepost-natal care

Identifiers

PMID33919264
PMCPMC8122667

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.