Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33919257›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2021

Accuracy of Computer-Assisted Dynamic Navigation in Implant Placement with a Fully Digital Approach: A Prospective Clinical Trial.

Cornelia Edelmann, Martin Wetzel, Anne Knipper, Ralph G Luthardt, Sigmar Schnutenhaus

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Dynamic Navigation in Dental Implantology.Discoveries (Craiova, Romania)
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Cornelia EdelmannCentre for Dentistry, Dr Schnutenhaus Community Health Centre (CHC) GmbH, 78247 Hilzingen, Germany.
Martin WetzelCentre for Dentistry, Dr Schnutenhaus Community Health Centre (CHC) GmbH, 78247 Hilzingen, Germany.
Anne KnipperCentre for Dentistry, Dr Schnutenhaus Community Health Centre (CHC) GmbH, 78247 Hilzingen, Germany.
Ralph G LuthardtDepartment of Dentistry, Clinic for Prosthodontics, Ulm University, 89081 Ulm, Germany.
Sigmar SchnutenhausCentre for Dentistry, Dr Schnutenhaus Community Health Centre (CHC) GmbH, 78247 Hilzingen, Germany.
Universität Ulm · DE

Funding

Oral reconstruction foundation OR42010
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis prospective clinical study aimed to investigate a possible deviation between the digitally planned implant position and the position achieved using dynamic navigation. The aim of the study was to establish clinical effectiveness and precision of implantation using dynamic navigation.

methodsTwenty consecutive patients received an implant (iSy-Implantat, Camlog, Wimsheim, Germany). One screw implant was placed in one jaw with remaining dentition of at least six teeth. The workflow was fully digital. Digital implant planning was conducted using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and an intraoral scan of the actual condition. Twenty implants were subsequently placed using a dynamic computer-assisted procedure. The clinical situation of the implant position was recorded using an intraoral scan. Using these data, models were produced via 3D printing, and CBCTs of these models were made using laboratory analogs. Deviations of the achieved implant position from the planned position were determined using evaluation software.

resultsThe evaluation of 20 implants resulted in a mean angle deviation of 2.7° (95% CI 2.2-3.3°). The 3D deviation at the implant shoulder was 1.83 mm (95% CI 1.34-2.33 mm). No significant differences were found for any of the parameters between the implantation in the upper or lower jaw and an open or flapless procedure (

conclusionThe clinical trial showed that sufficiently precise implantation was possible with the dynamic navigation system used here. Dynamic navigation can improve the quality of implant positioning. In particular, the procedure allows safe positioning of the implants in minimally invasive procedures, which usually cannot be performed freehand in this form. A clinical benefit and effectiveness can be determined from the results.

Indexed as

computer-aided surgerycomputer-assisted surgerydental implantsdynamic navigationreal-time tracking

Identifiers

PMID33919257
PMCPMC8122675
OpenAlexW3153992311

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.