Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33919024›Full record

ArticleBrain sciences2021

Comparison of Four fMRI Paradigms Probing Emotion Processing.

Corinna Hartling, Sophie Metz, Corinna Pehrs, Milan Scheidegger, Rebecca Gruzman, Christian Keicher, Andreas Wunder, Anne Weigand, Simone Grimm

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. TRPC4/5 inhibitors: Phase I results and proof of concept studies.European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience · 2025
    Review
  6. Semantic fMRI neurofeedback of emotions: from basic principles to clinical applications.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Article
  7. Understanding human amygdala function with artificial neural networks.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Neuropsychological Effects of Antidepressants: Translational Studies.Current topics in behavioral neurosciences · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Investigation of Neurofunctional Changes Over the Course of Electroconvulsive Therapy.The international journal of neuropsychopharmacology · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Subregional Amygdala Functional Connectivity at 3T: Comparison of High-Resolution 2D and 3D fMRI Acquisitions.Journal of neuroimaging : official journal of the American Society of Neuroimaging
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Corinna HartlingDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, CBF, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 12203 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6312-0232
Sophie MetzDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, CBF, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 12203 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1313-2208
Corinna PehrsBernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience, Humboldt-University Berlin, 10115 Berlin, Germany.
Milan ScheideggerDepartment of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, University of Zurich, 8032 Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-7552-4082
Rebecca GruzmanDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, CBF, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 12203 Berlin, Germany.
Christian KeicherCharité Research Organisation GmbH, 10117 Berlin, Germany.
Andreas WunderTranslational Medicine and Clinical Pharmacology, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH and Co. KG, 52216 Ingelheim am Rhein, Germany.
Anne WeigandDepartment of Psychology, Medical School Berlin, 14197 Berlin, Germany.
Simone GrimmDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, CBF, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 12203 Berlin, Germany.

Funding

Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co. KG research fundingDeutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft GR 4510/2-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Previous fMRI research has applied a variety of tasks to examine brain activity underlying emotion processing. While task characteristics are known to have a substantial influence on the elicited activations, direct comparisons of tasks that could guide study planning are scarce. We aimed to provide a comparison of four common emotion processing tasks based on the same analysis pipeline to suggest tasks best suited for the study of certain target brain regions. We studied an n-back task using emotional words (EMOBACK) as well as passive viewing tasks of emotional faces (FACES) and emotional scenes (OASIS and IAPS). We compared the activation patterns elicited by these tasks in four regions of interest (the amygdala, anterior insula, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC) and pregenual anterior cingulate cortex (pgACC)) in three samples of healthy adults (N = 45). The EMOBACK task elicited activation in the right dlPFC and bilateral anterior insula and deactivation in the pgACC while the FACES task recruited the bilateral amygdala. The IAPS and OASIS tasks showed similar activation patterns recruiting the bilateral amygdala and anterior insula. We conclude that these tasks can be used to study different regions involved in emotion processing and that the information provided is valuable for future research and the development of fMRI biomarkers.

Indexed as

amygdalaanterior insulaemotion processingfMRI paradigmspregenual ACC

Identifiers

PMID33919024
PMCPMC8142995

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.