ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2021
Can the Hole-Board Test Predict a Rat's Exploratory Behavior in a Free-Exploration Test?
Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- The tube-plugging test: a simple assay that reveals offspring-centered defensive behavior in postpartum mice.Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2026Article
- Environmental enrichment as a therapeutic strategy against methamphetamine induces depressive behaviors in mice.PloS one · 2025Article
- Aromas Influencing the GABAergic System.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study focuses on the rat activity in a hole-board setting that we considered a type of exploratory behavior. The general hypothesis is based on the claim that a motivational mechanism is central to both the response to novelty in a highly familiarized environment and the activity in the hole-board apparatus. Our sample consisted of 80 experimentally naive Lister Hooded rats. All rats were tested in the hole-board apparatus. Twenty individuals with the highest hole-board scores and twenty subjects with the lowest hole-board scores subsequently underwent an established free-exploration test. In our study, the scores obtained in the hole-board test had little predictive value for the rats' activity in the free-exploration test. Based on our previous experience in studying exploratory behavior in the free-exploration test and the data presented in this paper, we suggest that the hole-board test is not an appropriate tool for measuring exploratory behavior in laboratory rodents.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.