Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33918754›Full record

ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2021

An Investigation of Human Errors in Medication Adverse Event Improvement Priority Using a Hybrid Approach.

Min-Chih Hsieh, Po-Yi Chiang, Yu-Chi Lee, Eric Min-Yang Wang, Wen-Chuan Kung, Ya-Tzu Hu, Ming-Shi Huang, Huei-Chi Hsieh

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Min-Chih HsiehDepartment of Industrial Engineering, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai 200093, China.ORCID 0000-0002-3173-7721
Po-Yi ChiangDepartment of Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu 30013, Taiwan.
Yu-Chi LeeSchool of Design, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510006, China.ORCID 0000-0002-5689-8441
Eric Min-Yang WangDepartment of Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu 30013, Taiwan.
Wen-Chuan KungNursing Department, Hsinchu Mackay Memorial Hospital, Hsinchu 30071, Taiwan.
Ya-Tzu HuPharmacy Department, Hsinchu Mackay Memorial Hospital, Hsinchu 30071, Taiwan.
Ming-Shi HuangNursing Department, Hsinchu Mackay Memorial Hospital, Hsinchu 30071, Taiwan.
Huei-Chi HsiehNursing Department, Hsinchu Mackay Memorial Hospital, Hsinchu 30071, Taiwan.
Mackay Memorial Hospital · TWNational Tsing Hua University · TWSouth China University of Technology · CNUniversity of Shanghai for Science and Technology · CN

Funding

Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan MOST 104-2221-E-007-084-MY3
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to analyze and provide an in-depth improvement priority for medication adverse events. Thus, the Human Factor Analysis and Classification System with subfactors was used in this study to analyze the adverse events. Subsequently, the improvement priority for the subfactors was determined using the hybrid approach in terms of the Analytical Hierarchy Process and the fuzzy Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution. In Of the 157 medical adverse events selected from the Taiwan Patient-safety Reporting system, 25 cases were identified as medication adverse events. The Human Factor Analysis and Classification System and root cause analysis were used to analyze the error factors and subfactors that existed in the medication adverse events. Following the analysis, the Analytical Hierarchy Process and the fuzzy Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution were used to determine the improvement priority for subfactors. The results showed that the decision errors, crew resource management, inadequate supervision, and organizational climate contained more types of subfactors than other error factors in each category. In the current study, 16 improvement priorities were identified. According to the results, the improvement priorities can assist medical staff, researchers, and decisionmakers in improving medication process deficiencies efficiently.

Indexed as

Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP)human errorHuman Factor Analysis and Classification System (HFACS)medication adverse eventsTechnique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS)

Identifiers

PMID33918754
PMCPMC8069284
OpenAlexW3154040556

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.