Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33918709›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

Validation of the Hedonic and Eudaimonic Motives for Activities-Revised Scale in Chinese Adults.

Wenjie Li, Linting Zhang, Ning Jia, Feng Kong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. When Do Hedonic and Eudaimonic Orientations Lead to Happiness? Moderating Effects of Orientation Priority.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Wenjie LiDepartment of Psychology, Shaanxi Normal University, 199 South Chang'an Road, Xi'an 710062, China.ORCID 0000-0003-4195-8760
Linting ZhangDepartment of Psychology, Shaanxi Normal University, 199 South Chang'an Road, Xi'an 710062, China.ORCID 0000-0001-9687-3954
Ning JiaDepartment of Psychology, Shaanxi Normal University, 199 South Chang'an Road, Xi'an 710062, China.
Feng KongDepartment of Psychology, Shaanxi Normal University, 199 South Chang'an Road, Xi'an 710062, China.ORCID 0000-0002-5571-3994

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Hedonic and Eudaimonic Motives for Activities-Revised scale (HEMA-R) is one of the most extensively used instruments to assess how people pursue well-being. The main aims of the present research were to translate HEMA-R into Chinese and test its construct and predictive validity as well as measurement invariance across gender. In Study 1, we conducted confirmatory factor analysis with data containing 1090 Chinese undergraduates, and replicated the two-factor model which has been found in other studies. Furthermore, the measurement invariance across gender was supported throughout the multi-group confirmatory factor analysis. Study 2 replicated these results and further found the HEMA-R had satisfactory predictive validity in measures of well-being, social support and smartphone addiction. All the findings indicate that the HEMA-R is reliable and valid to measure hedonic and eudaimonic motives, and it could be applied generally across gender in Chinese adults.

Indexed as

Asian PeopleMotivationAdultChinaFactor Analysis, StatisticalHumansPsychometricsReproducibility of Resultsconfirmatory factor analysishedonic and eudaimonic motivesmeasurement invariancereliabilityvalidity

Identifiers

PMID33918709
PMCPMC8068976

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.