Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33918681›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Comparison and Fusion of Machine Learning Algorithms for Prospective Validation of PET/CT Radiomic Features Prognostic Value in Stage II-III Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Shima Sepehri, Olena Tankyevych, Taman Upadhaya, Dimitris Visvikis, Mathieu Hatt, Catherine Cheze Le Rest

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Predicting aggressive disease and poor outcome in endometrial cancer using preoperative [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Clinical application ofJapanese journal of radiology · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. The Efficacy of PretreatmentClinical Medicine Insights. Oncology · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Accurate Tumor DelineationFrontiers in oncology · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Shima SepehriLaTIM, INSERM, UMR 1101, University Brest, 29200 Brest, France.
Olena TankyevychLaTIM, INSERM, UMR 1101, University Brest, 29200 Brest, France.
Taman UpadhayaNuclear Medicine Department, CHU Milétrie, 86021 Poitiers, France.
Dimitris VisvikisLaTIM, INSERM, UMR 1101, University Brest, 29200 Brest, France.
Mathieu HattLaTIM, INSERM, UMR 1101, University Brest, 29200 Brest, France.
Catherine Cheze Le RestLaTIM, INSERM, UMR 1101, University Brest, 29200 Brest, France.ORCID 0000-0001-9779-9135

Funding

Ministère de l'Enseignement Supérieur et de la Recherche R16063NN
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Machine learning (ML) algorithms for selecting and combining radiomic features into multiparametric prediction models have become popular; however, it has been shown that large variations in performance can be obtained by relying on different approaches. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the potential benefit of combining different algorithms into an improved consensus for the final prediction, as it has been shown in other fields.

Indexed as

machine learningnon-small cell lung cancerprognosisprospective studyradiomics

Identifiers

PMID33918681
PMCPMC8069690

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.