Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33918617›Full record

ArticleAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Overview and Evaluation of Existing Guidelines for Rational Antimicrobial Use in Small-Animal Veterinary Practice in Europe.

Fergus Allerton, Cameron Prior, Arzu Funda Bagcigil, Els Broens, Bénédicte Callens, Peter Damborg, Jeroen Dewulf, Maria-Eleni Filippitzi, Luís Pedro Carmo, Jonathan Gómez-Raja and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Evolution and Antimicrobial Resistance Profiles ofAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Genomic Characterization of Carbapenem-ResistantAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Veterinary sciences · 2024
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Fergus AllertonWillows Veterinary Centre and Referral Service, Highlands Road, Shirley, Solihull B90 4NH, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4856-3307
Cameron PriorVeterinary Specialists Scotland, 1 Deer Park Road Livingston, Scotland EH54 8AG, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5254-3205
Arzu Funda BagcigilDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Istanbul University-Cerrahpaşa, 34320 Avcılar, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-8838-7291
Els BroensFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Biomolecular Health Sciences, Utrecht University, Yalelaan 1, 3584 CL Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-1312-6115
Bénédicte CallensCentre of Knowledge on Antimicrobial Use and Resistance, Galileelaan 5/02, 1210 Brussels, Belgium.
Peter DamborgDepartment of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Stigbøjlen 4, 1870 Frederiksberg, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-9932-5996
Jeroen DewulfVeterinary Epidemiology Unit, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Salisburylaan 133, 9820 Merelbeke, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-9843-5990
Maria-Eleni FilippitziVeterinary Epidemiology Unit, Sciensano, 1050 Brussels, Belgium.
Luís Pedro CarmoVeterinary Public Health Institute, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Bern, Schwarzenburgstrasse 161, 3097 Liebefeld, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-7367-5178
Jonathan Gómez-RajaFundeSalud, Government of Extremadura, Pio Baroja 10, 06800 Mérida, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-2926-8169
Erez HarpazFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, Institute for Production Animal Clinical Science, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Small Ruminant Research and Herd Health, Høyland, 4325 Sandnes, Norway.
Ana MateusHawkshead Campus, Royal Veterinary College, University of London, Hawkshead Lane, Hatfield AL9 7TA, Hertfordshire, UK.
Mirja NolffClinic for Small Animal Surgery Tierspital Zürich, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Zürich, Winterthurerstrasse 260, 8057 Zürich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-9317-7769
Clare J PhythianFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, Institute for Production Animal Clinical Science, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Small Ruminant Research and Herd Health, Høyland, 4325 Sandnes, Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-3140-4414
Dorina TimofteDepartment of Veterinary Anatomy, Leahurst Campus, Institute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Sciences, Physiology and Pathology, University of Liverpool, Neston CH64 7TE, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7261-738X
Flavia ZendriDepartment of Veterinary Anatomy, Leahurst Campus, Institute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Sciences, Physiology and Pathology, University of Liverpool, Neston CH64 7TE, UK.
Lisbeth Rem JessenDepartment of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Dyrlægevej 16, 1870 Frederiksberg C, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-9882-1637

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antimicrobial stewardship guidelines (ASGs) represent an important tool to help veterinarians optimize their antimicrobial use with the objective of decreasing antimicrobial resistance. The aim of this study was to map and qualitatively assess the ASGs for antimicrobial use in cats and dogs in Europe. Country representatives of the European Network for Optimization of Veterinary Antimicrobial Treatment (ENOVAT) were asked to identify ASGs published in their countries. All collated ASGs updated since January 2010 containing recommendations on antimicrobial therapy for at least three conditions affecting different organ systems in cats and dogs underwent detailed review including AGREE II analysis. Out of forty countries investigated, fifteen ASGs from eleven countries met the inclusion criteria. Several critical principles of antimicrobial use were identified, providing a framework that should assist development of stewardship guidance. The AGREE II analysis highlighted several methodological limitations of the currently available ASGs. This study sheds light on the lack of national ASGs for dogs and cats in multiple European countries and should encourage national bodies to prioritize guideline development in small animals. A greater awareness of the need to use a structured approach to guideline development could improve the quality of ASGs in the future.

Indexed as

AGREE IIantimicrobial resistanceantimicrobial stewardshipcaninefelineguidelines

Identifiers

PMID33918617
PMCPMC8069046

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.