Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33918568›Full record

SynthesisNutrients2021

How Does the Dietary Intake of Female Field-Based Team Sport Athletes Compare to Dietary Recommendations for Health and Performance? A Systematic Literature Review.

Michèle Renard, David T Kelly, Niamh Ní Chéilleachair, Ciarán Ó Catháin

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Nutrients, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Michèle RenardDepartment of Sport and Health Sciences, Athlone Institute of Technology, N37 HD68 Athlone, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0003-4517-1316
David T KellyDepartment of Sport and Health Sciences, Athlone Institute of Technology, N37 HD68 Athlone, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-6131-4834
Niamh Ní ChéilleachairDepartment of Sport and Health Sciences, Athlone Institute of Technology, N37 HD68 Athlone, Ireland.
Ciarán Ó CatháinDepartment of Sport and Health Sciences, Athlone Institute of Technology, N37 HD68 Athlone, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-8526-8924
Athlone Institute of Technology · IE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Field-based team sports present large energetic demands given their intermittent high-intensity nature. Current evidence suggests that the dietary intake of female athletes may be insufficient to meet such demands, resulting in negative consequences for athletic performance and health. The primary aim of this review was to therefore assess the adequacy of dietary intake of female field-based team sport athletes when compared to dietary recommendations. A systematic search of databases, including PubMed, Web of Science, SPORTDiscus, and OpenGrey, was performed from the earliest record available until July 2020, obtaining an initial total of 2588 articles. To be included within the final review, articles were required to provide a quantitative assessment of baseline dietary intake specific to the target population. A total of 20 studies (

Indexed as

AthletesEatingTeam SportsAdolescentAdultAthletic PerformanceEnergy IntakeEnergy MetabolismFemaleHumansNutrientsNutritional RequirementsNutrientscarbohydrate intakeenergyfemale healthLEAnutritional recommendationssports nutrition

Identifiers

PMID33918568
PMCPMC8069310
OpenAlexW3141674130

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.