Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33918484›Full record

ArticleBiomolecules2021

Human Cadaveric Donor Cornea Derived Extra Cellular Matrix Microparticles for Minimally Invasive Healing/Regeneration of Corneal Wounds.

Arun Chandru, Parinita Agrawal, Sanjay Kumar Ojha, Kamalnath Selvakumar, Vaishnavi K Shiva, Tanmay Gharat, Shivaram Selvam, Midhun Ben Thomas, Mukesh Damala, Deeksha Prasad and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomolecules, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Biomaterials for Corneal Regeneration.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Corneal stromal repair and regeneration.Progress in retinal and eye research · 2022
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Arun ChandruPandorum Technologies Private Limited, Bangalore, Karnataka 560100, India.
Parinita AgrawalPandorum Technologies Private Limited, Bangalore, Karnataka 560100, India.
Sanjay Kumar OjhaPandorum Technologies Private Limited, Bangalore, Karnataka 560100, India.
Kamalnath SelvakumarPandorum Technologies Private Limited, Bangalore, Karnataka 560100, India.ORCID 0000-0003-0860-4493
Vaishnavi K ShivaPandorum Technologies Private Limited, Bangalore, Karnataka 560100, India.
Tanmay GharatPandorum Technologies Private Limited, Bangalore, Karnataka 560100, India.
Shivaram SelvamPandorum Technologies Private Limited, Bangalore, Karnataka 560100, India.
Midhun Ben ThomasPandorum Technologies Private Limited, Bangalore, Karnataka 560100, India.
Mukesh DamalaBrien Holden Eye Research Center, LV Prasad Eye Institute, Hyderabad, Telangana 500034, India.
Deeksha PrasadBrien Holden Eye Research Center, LV Prasad Eye Institute, Hyderabad, Telangana 500034, India.
Sayan BasuBrien Holden Eye Research Center, LV Prasad Eye Institute, Hyderabad, Telangana 500034, India.
Tuhin BhowmickPandorum Technologies Private Limited, Bangalore, Karnataka 560100, India.
Virender Singh SangwanBrien Holden Eye Research Center, LV Prasad Eye Institute, Hyderabad, Telangana 500034, India.
Vivek SinghBrien Holden Eye Research Center, LV Prasad Eye Institute, Hyderabad, Telangana 500034, India.
L V Prasad Eye Institute · IN

Funding

Hyderabad Eye Research Foundation InstitutionalPandorum Technologies Private Limited, Bangalore India Institutional
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biological materials derived from extracellular matrix (ECM) proteins have garnered interest as their composition is very similar to that of native tissue. Herein, we report the use of human cornea derived decellularized ECM (dECM) microparticles dispersed in human fibrin sealant as an accessible therapeutic alternative for corneal anterior stromal reconstruction. dECM microparticles had good particle size distribution (≤10 µm) and retained the majority of corneal ECM components found in native tissue. Fibrin-dECM hydrogels exhibited compressive modulus of 70.83 ± 9.17 kPa matching that of native tissue, maximum burst pressure of 34.3 ± 3.7 kPa, and demonstrated a short crosslinking time of ~17 min. The fibrin-dECM hydrogels were found to be biodegradable, cytocompatible, non-mutagenic, non-sensitive, non-irritant, and supported the growth and maintained the phenotype of encapsulated human corneal stem cells (hCSCs) in vitro. In a rabbit model of anterior lamellar keratectomy, fibrin-dECM bio-adhesives promoted corneal re-epithelialization within 14 days, induced stromal tissue repair, and displayed integration with corneal tissues in vivo. Overall, our results suggest that the incorporation of cornea tissue-derived ECM microparticles in fibrin hydrogels is non-toxic, safe, and shows tremendous promise as a minimally invasive therapeutic approach for the treatment of superficial corneal epithelial wounds and anterior stromal injuries.

Indexed as

Wound HealingAnimalsCadaverCell ProliferationCorneaCorneal DiseasesExtracellular MatrixFibrinHumansHydrogelsRabbitsStem CellsStem Cell TransplantationTissue EngineeringFibrinHydrogelsdecellularizationextracellular matrixfibrin hydrogelshuman corneain vivo imaging

Identifiers

PMID33918484
PMCPMC8066719
OpenAlexW3143144719

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.