ArticleMicromachines2021
Computational and Histological Analyses for Investigating Mechanical Interaction of Thermally Drawn Fiber Implants with Brain Tissue.
Article in Micromachines, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Reliable AI Platform for Monitoring BCI Caused Brain Injury and Providing Real-Time Protection.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Finite element model predicts micromotion-induced strain profiles that correlate with the functional performance of Utah arrays in humans and non-human primates.Journal of neural engineering · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The development of a compliant neural probe is necessary to achieve chronic implantation with minimal signal loss. Although fiber-based neural probes fabricated by the thermal drawing process have been proposed as a solution, their long-term effect on the brain has not been thoroughly investigated. Here, we examined the mechanical interaction of thermally drawn fiber implants with neural tissue through computational and histological analyses. Specifically, finite element analysis and immunohistochemistry were conducted to evaluate the biocompatibility of various fiber implants made with different base materials (steel, silica, polycarbonate, and hydrogel). Moreover, the effects of the coefficient of friction and geometric factors including aspect ratio and the shape of the cross-section on the strain were investigated with the finite element model. As a result, we observed that the fiber implants fabricated with extremely softer material such as hydrogel exhibited significantly lower strain distribution and elicited a reduced immune response. In addition, the implants with higher coefficient of friction (COF) and/or circular cross-sections showed a lower strain distribution and smaller critical volume. This work suggests the materials and design factors that need to be carefully considered to develop future fiber-based neural probes to minimize mechanical invasiveness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.