Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33918236›Full record

ArticleNutrients2021

Executive Functions and Body Weight at Different Ages: A Preliminary Study.

Francesca Favieri, Eunice Chen, Maria Casagrande

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrients, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Francesca FavieriDepartment of Psychology, "Sapienza" University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6696-5855
Eunice ChenDepartment of Psychology, Temple University, Filadelfia, PA 19122, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9288-7133
Maria CasagrandeDepartment of Dynamic and Clinical Psychology and Health Studies, "Sapienza" University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4430-3367

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recently, researchers have focused their attention on the role of cognitive processes on eating habits and body weight changes. Few studies have examined the relationship between the first stages of overweight and executive functions (EFs), excluding obesity conditions. This study is aimed to detect the involvement of the EFs and their predictive role on body mass index (BMI) in a sample of healthy individuals from childhood to young adulthood with a cross-sectional design. One-hundred and sixty-six healthy students were recruited from different Italian public schools: 46 children (age range: 7-11), 50 adolescents (age range: 15-18), 70 young adults (age range: 19-30). BMI was used to evaluate body weight and different EFs tasks were used to assess the EFs domains of inhibition, updating and shifting. After adjusting BMI for age, a hierarchical multiple linear regression was carried out for each EFs task. Pearson's r correlations were reported for each of the age subgroups. Motor disinhibition was associated with greater BMI in the overall sample. Higher BMI was related to poorer set-shifting in adolescence and poorer motor inhibition in young adulthood, but higher BMI was not associated with EFs in childhood. Differences in the development of EFs over time may influence weight changes over time through different responses to food and eating behavior.

Indexed as

Age FactorsFeeding BehaviorAdolescentAdultBody Mass IndexBody WeightChildCross-Sectional StudiesExecutive FunctionFemaleHumansInhibition, PsychologicalLinear ModelsMaleOverweightPsychomotor Performancebody weightdevelopmentexecutive functionsoverweight

Identifiers

PMID33918236
PMCPMC8065405

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.