Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33918214›Full record

ReviewJournal of personalized medicine2021

Personalized Clinical Phenotyping through Systems Medicine and Artificial Intelligence.

Alfredo Cesario, Marika D'Oria, Francesco Bove, Giuseppe Privitera, Ivo Boškoski, Daniela Pedicino, Luca Boldrini, Carmen Erra, Claudia Loreti, Giovanna Liuzzo and 10 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of personalized medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Allies not enemies-creating a more empathetic and uplifting patient experience through technology and art.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Alfredo CesarioOpen Innovation Unit, Scientific Directorate, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4687-0709
Marika D'OriaOpen Innovation Unit, Scientific Directorate, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4253-8223
Francesco BoveNeurology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2959-6659
Giuseppe PriviteraCEMAD-IBD Unit-Internal Medicine and Gastroenterology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy.
Ivo BoškoskiSurgical Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8194-2670
Daniela PedicinoCardiology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy.
Luca BoldriniRadiation Oncology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5631-1575
Carmen ErraHigh Intensity Neurorehabilitation Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy.
Claudia LoretiHigh Intensity Neurorehabilitation Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0835-4079
Giovanna LiuzzoCardiology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy.
Filippo CreaCardiology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy.
Alessandro ArmuzziCEMAD-IBD Unit-Internal Medicine and Gastroenterology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1572-0118
Antonio GasbarriniCEMAD-IBD Unit-Internal Medicine and Gastroenterology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy.
Paolo CalabresiNeurology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy.
Luca PaduaHigh Intensity Neurorehabilitation Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy.
Guido CostamagnaSurgical Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy.
Massimo AntonelliAnesthesia, Resuscitation, Intensive Care and Clinical Toxicology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy.
Vincenzo ValentiniRadiation Oncology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy.
Charles AuffrayEuropean Institute for Systems Biology and Medicine (EISBM), 69390 Vourles, France.
Giovanni ScambiaScientific Directorate, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy.
Agostino Gemelli University Polyclinic · ITUniversità Cattolica del Sacro Cuore · ITEuropean Institute for Systems Biology and Medicine

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Personalized Medicine (PM) has shifted the traditional top-down approach to medicine based on the identification of single etiological factors to explain diseases, which was not suitable for explaining complex conditions. The concept of PM assumes several interpretations in the literature, with particular regards to Genetic and Genomic Medicine. Despite the fact that some disease-modifying genes affect disease expression and progression, many complex conditions cannot be understood through only this lens, especially when other lifestyle factors can play a crucial role (such as the environment, emotions, nutrition, etc.). Personalizing clinical phenotyping becomes a challenge when different pathophysiological mechanisms underlie the same manifestation. Brain disorders, cardiovascular and gastroenterological diseases can be paradigmatic examples. Experiences on the field of Fondazione Policlinico Gemelli in Rome (a research hospital recognized by the Italian Ministry of Health as national leader in "Personalized Medicine" and "Innovative Biomedical Technologies") could help understanding which techniques and tools are the most performing to develop potential clinical phenotypes personalization. The connection between practical experiences and scientific literature highlights how this potential can be reached towards Systems Medicine using Artificial Intelligence tools.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencecardiologydigestive endoscopygastroenterologymachine learningneurologyneurorehabilitationP4 medicinepersonalized medicinesystems medicine

Identifiers

PMID33918214
PMCPMC8065854
OpenAlexW3145322775

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.