Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33917707›Full record

ReviewNutrients2021

Paraprobiotics: A New Perspective for Functional Foods and Nutraceuticals.

Rosa Anna Siciliano, Anna Reale, Maria Fiorella Mazzeo, Stefano Morandi, Tiziana Silvetti, Milena Brasca

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nutrients, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 105 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
105citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

105 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Effects of Heat-KilledNutrients · 2026
    Trial
  3. Effects of ParaprobioticJournal of microbiology and biotechnology · 2025
    Trial
  4. Effect of Heat-TreatedNutrients · 2024
    Trial
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Preventive effect of heat-killed Lactiplantibacillus plantarum FM8 in an ovalbumin-induced food allergy murine model.Allergy, asthma, and clinical immunology : official journal of the Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2026
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. DualFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

45 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Rosa Anna SicilianoInstitute of Food Sciences, National Research Council (CNR-ISA), Via Roma 64, 83100 Avellino, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1042-3424
Anna RealeInstitute of Food Sciences, National Research Council (CNR-ISA), Via Roma 64, 83100 Avellino, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5576-257X
Maria Fiorella MazzeoInstitute of Food Sciences, National Research Council (CNR-ISA), Via Roma 64, 83100 Avellino, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1542-0027
Stefano MorandiInstitute of Sciences of Food Production, National Research Council (CNR-ISPA), Via G. Celoria 2, 20133 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5755-300X
Tiziana SilvettiInstitute of Sciences of Food Production, National Research Council (CNR-ISPA), Via G. Celoria 2, 20133 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2205-2867
Milena BrascaInstitute of Sciences of Food Production, National Research Council (CNR-ISPA), Via G. Celoria 2, 20133 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8821-0787

Funding

European Union's Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme-METROFOOD-PP project 871083National Research Council, Italy- project NUTR-AGE FOE-2019, DSB.AD004.271
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Probiotics are live microorganisms that confer health benefits on the host. However, in recent years, several concerns on their use have been raised. In particular, industrial processing and storage of probiotic products are still technological challenges as these could severely impair cell viability. On the other hand, safety of live microorganisms should be taken into account, especially when administered to vulnerable people, such as the elderly and immunodeficient individuals. These drawbacks have enhanced the interest toward new products based on non-viable probiotics such as paraprobiotics and postbiotics. In particular, paraprobiotics, defined as "inactivated microbial cells (non-viable) that confer a health benefit to the consumer," hold the ability to regulate the adaptive and innate immune systems, exhibit anti-inflammatory, antiproliferative and antioxidant properties and exert antagonistic effect against pathogens. Moreover, paraprobiotics can exhibit enhanced safety, assure technological and practical benefits and can also be used in products suitable for people with weak immunity and the elderly. These features offer an important opportunity to prompt the market with novel functional foods or nutraceuticals that are safer and more stable. This review provides an overview of central issues on paraprobiotics and highlights the urgent need for further studies aimed at assessing safety and efficacy of these products and their mechanisms of action in order to support decisions of regulatory authorities. Finally, a definition is proposed that unambiguously distinguishes paraprobiotics from postbiotics.

Indexed as

Dietary SupplementsFunctional FoodAnimalsDairy ProductsHumansProbioticsQuality ControlSocial Control, Formaldairy foodshealth benefitsimmunomodulationinactivationnon-dairy foodparaprobioticsprobiotics

Identifiers

PMID33917707
PMCPMC8068161

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.