Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33917677›Full record

Trial reportInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

Sociodemographic, Behavioral and Oral Health Factors in Maternal and Child Health: An Interventional and Associative Study from the Network Perspective.

Juliana Ribeiro Francelino Sampaio, Suely Arruda Vidal, Paulo Savio Angeiras de Goes, Paulo Felipe R Bandeira, José Eulálio Cabral Filho

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Perspectives on Social and Environmental Determinants of Oral Health.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Juliana Ribeiro Francelino SampaioFaculty of CECAPE, Medicine College Estácio of Juazeiro do Norte, Juazeiro do Norte, CE 63040-360, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-7904-4828
Suely Arruda VidalStudy Group on Health Management and Evaluation at IMIP/Pernambuco, Institute of Integral Medicine Fernando Figueira-IMIP, Recife, PE 50070-550, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-4268-520X
Paulo Savio Angeiras de GoesChild and Adolescent Health Program, Department of Clinic and Preventive Dentistry, Federal University of Pernambuco-UFPE, Recife, PE 50670-901, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-6708-0450
Paulo Felipe R BandeiraCenter for Biological and Health Sciences, Regional University of Cariri-URCA/Ceará, Northeastern Family Health Training Network-RENASF, Crato, CE 63105-000, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-8260-0189
José Eulálio Cabral FilhoPost-Graduation Stricto Sensu, Institute of Integral Medicine Professor Fernan-do Figueira-IMIP, Recife, PE 50070-550, Brazil.
Instituto de Medicina Integral Professor Fernando Figueira · BRUniversidade Federal de Pernambuco · BRUniversidade Regional do Cariri · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Oral healthcare during pregnancy needs to be part of the assistance routine given to pregnant women by health professionals as a way to encourage self-care and strengthen the general health of the mother and the baby. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of an integrated oral healthcare intervention for pregnant women and to analyze the association of sociodemographic, behavioral, oral health and general maternal and child health factors in prenatal care at usual risk in primary care in a city in the northeast of Brazil, in 2018-2019. A controlled, randomized, single-blinded community trial was conducted. The intervention group (IG) received dental assistance and collective health education actions in conversation circles, while the control group (CG) received the usual assistance. All pregnant women (146 in total, 58 from IG and 88 from CG) that took part in the trial answered a questionnaire and underwent a dental examination at the beginning of prenatal care and at the puerperal visit. To assess the effect of the intervention, a network analysis was used. The results have shown that being in the control group was associated with neonatal complications (0.89) and prematurity (0.54); the use of tobacco and alcohol are associated with high risk in initial and final oral health; lower educational level of the pregnant women implicates high risk for initial oral health (-0.19), final oral health (-0.26), pregnancy complications (-0.13), low birth weight (-0.23), prematurity (-0.19) and complications in the newborn (-0.14). Having a low family income (≤261.36 USD) has shown a high risk for initial oral health (-0.14), final oral health (-0.20) and prematurity (-0.15). The intervention based on integrated oral healthcare for pregnant women indicated that socioeconomic and behavioral factors must be considered as determinants for the quality of women and children's health and that multi-professional performance during prenatal care contributes to the positive outcomes of pregnancy.

Indexed as

Child HealthOral HealthBrazilChildFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornPregnancyPregnant PeoplePrenatal Careclinical trialintegrality in healthnetwork perspectiveoral healthprenatal care

Identifiers

PMID33917677
PMCPMC8067955
OpenAlexW3142749217

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.