Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33917563›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

Detecting Digoxin Toxicity by Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Electrocardiography.

Da-Wei Chang, Chin-Sheng Lin, Tien-Ping Tsao, Chia-Cheng Lee, Jiann-Torng Chen, Chien-Sung Tsai, Wei-Shiang Lin, Chin Lin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Da-Wei ChangDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei 11490, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-7410-2339
Chin-Sheng LinDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei 11490, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-5167-8327
Tien-Ping TsaoDivision of Cardiology, Heart Centre, Cheng Hsin General Hospital, Taipei 112, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-9935-5172
Chia-Cheng LeePlanning and Management Office, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei 11490, Taiwan.
Jiann-Torng ChenDepartment of Ophthalmology, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei 11490, Taiwan.
Chien-Sung TsaiDivision of Cardiovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei 11490, Taiwan.
Wei-Shiang LinDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei 11490, Taiwan.
Chin LinSchool of Public Health, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei 11490, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0003-2337-2096
Tri-Service General Hospital · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although digoxin is important in heart rate control, the utilization of digoxin is declining due to its narrow therapeutic window. Misdiagnosis or delayed diagnosis of digoxin toxicity is common due to the lack of awareness and the time-consuming laboratory work that is involved. Electrocardiography (ECG) may be able to detect potential digoxin toxicity based on characteristic presentations. Our study attempted to develop a deep learning model to detect digoxin toxicity based on ECG manifestations. This study included 61 ECGs from patients with digoxin toxicity and 177,066 ECGs from patients in the emergency room from November 2011 to February 2019. The deep learning algorithm was trained using approximately 80% of ECGs. The other 20% of ECGs were used to validate the performance of the Artificial Intelligence (AI) system and to conduct a human-machine competition. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity were used to evaluate the performance of ECG interpretation between humans and our deep learning system. The AUCs of our deep learning system for identifying digoxin toxicity were 0.912 and 0.929 in the validation cohort and the human-machine competition, respectively, which reached 84.6% of sensitivity and 94.6% of specificity. Interestingly, the deep learning system using only lead I (AUC = 0.960) was not worse than using complete 12 leads (0.912). Stratified analysis showed that our deep learning system was more applicable to patients with heart failure (HF) and without atrial fibrillation (AF) than those without HF and with AF. Our ECG-based deep learning system provides a high-accuracy, economical, rapid, and accessible way to detect digoxin toxicity, which can be applied as a promising decision supportive system for diagnosing digoxin toxicity in clinical practice.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceDeep LearningAlgorithmsDigoxinElectrocardiographyHumansRetrospective StudiesDigoxinartificial intelligencedeep learning algorithmdigoxin toxicityelectrocardiogram

Identifiers

PMID33917563
PMCPMC8038815
OpenAlexW3146621982

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.