Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33917509›Full record

ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2021

An Experimental Education Project for Consultations of Older Adults during the Pandemic and Healthcare Lockdown.

Agnieszka Neumann-Podczaska, Mikołaj Seostianin, Konrad Madejczyk, Piotr Merks, Urszula Religioni, Zofia Tomczak, Sławomir Tobis, Daniela Claudia Moga, Melody Ryan, Katarzyna Wieczorowska-Tobis

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Digital literacy in undergraduate pharmacy education: a scoping review.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2024
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Patient Perceptions on Receiving Vaccination Services through Community Pharmacies.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Agnieszka Neumann-PodczaskaChair and Department of Palliative Medicine, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, 61-245 Poznan, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-0060-7430
Mikołaj SeostianinChair and Department of Palliative Medicine, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, 61-245 Poznan, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-7754-3949
Konrad MadejczykChair and Department of Palliative Medicine, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, 61-245 Poznan, Poland.
Piotr MerksCollegium Medicum, Faculty of Medicine, Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński University, 01-938 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-8966-3799
Urszula ReligioniCollegium of Business Administration, Warsaw School of Economics, 02-513 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-1434-2138
Zofia TomczakChair and Department of Palliative Medicine, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, 61-245 Poznan, Poland.
Sławomir TobisDepartment of Occupational Therapy, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, 60-781 Poznan, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-0764-3258
Daniela Claudia MogaDepartment of Pharmacy Practice and Science, College of Pharmacy, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40536, USA.
Melody RyanDepartment of Pharmacy Practice and Science, College of Pharmacy, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40536, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2098-3775
Katarzyna Wieczorowska-TobisChair and Department of Palliative Medicine, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, 61-245 Poznan, Poland.
Poznan University of Medical Sciences · PLUniversity of Kentucky · USCardinal Stefan Wyszynski University in Warsaw · PLSGH Warsaw School of Economics · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo develop a mentor-supervised, interprofessional, geriatric telemedicine experiential education project in response to the COVID-19 pandemic.

methodMedical and pharmacy students collaborated via remote consultations to address the coexistence of multimorbidity and polypharmacy in geriatric patients. In-depth interviews of students and patients as well as Likert scale-based telephonic survey were performed for a comprehensive evaluation of the project's significance.

resultsTo date, 49 consultations have been conducted. Remote consultations performed by medical and pharmacy students working collaboratively were beneficial for both students, participants. CONCLUSIONS AND PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: This experimental education project provided students with authentic challenges while simultaneously delivering care to the older adults who are susceptible to disruption of care associated with the pandemic. Further development and expanded implementation of such approaches may be a post-pandemic practice to provide more accessible care for senior patients while incorporating interprofessional education.

Indexed as

COVID-19interprofessional educationmedical studentsolder adultspharmacy studentstelehealth

Identifiers

PMID33917509
PMCPMC8067444
OpenAlexW3146873086

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.