Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33917429›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

Development of the Conceptualization of Pain Questionnaire: A Measure to Study How Children Conceptualize Pain.

Isabel Salvat, Cristina Adillón, Eva Maria Andrés, Sonia Monterde, Jordi Miró

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05731401 (Expressed Beliefs About the Cause of Pain in a Paediatric Population), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05731401 completednot on this map

Expressed Beliefs About the Cause of Pain in a Paediatric Population: a Mixed Explanatory Sequential Study.

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity Rovira i VirgiliRan2021 to 2022Enrolled345ConditionsChronic Pain, Pediatric ALL, Pain PerceptionArmsExplanations of the cause of pain
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Exploring Adolescents' Understanding, Experiences and Beliefs About Pain: A Qualitative Study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Isabel SalvatDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Institut d'Investigació Sanitària Pere Virgili, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, 43204 Reus, Spain.
Cristina AdillónDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Institut d'Investigació Sanitària Pere Virgili, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, 43204 Reus, Spain.
Eva Maria AndrésGrupo de Investigación "Gestión en el Paciente Sangrante" IdiPaz, Department of Economía de la Empresa, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos Economía Aplicada II y Fundamentos Análisis Económico, 28933 Madrid, Spain.
Sonia MonterdeDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Institut d'Investigació Sanitària Pere Virgili, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, 43204 Reus, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-5580-3757
Jordi MiróUnit for the Study and Treatment of Pain-ALGOS, Chair in Pediatric Pain URV-FG, Research Center in Behavior Assessment and Measurement, Department of Psychology, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, 43007 Tarragona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-1998-6653

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

(1) Background: Research has shown that thoughts about pain are important for the management of chronic pain in children. In order to monitor changes in thoughts about pain over time and evaluate the efficacy of treatments, we need valid and reliable measures. The aims of this study were to develop a questionnaire to assess a child's concept of pain and to evaluate its psychometric properties; (2) Methods: This is a cross-sectional, two-phase, mixed-method study. A total of 324 individuals aged 8 to 17 years old responded to the newly created questionnaire. The Conceptualization of Pain Questionnaire (COPAQ) was calibrated using the Rasch model. The chi-square test was used for the fit statistics. Underfit and overfit of the model were determined and a descriptive analysis of infit and outfit was conducted to identify who responded erratically. Internal consistency was measured using the Person Separation Index (PSI); (3) Results: Fit to the Rasch model was good. Suitable targeting indicated which items were simple to answer; Person Fit identified 9.56% children who responded erratically; PSI = 0.814; (4) Conclusions: The findings suggest that COPAQ is a measure of a child's concept of pain that is easy to administer and respond to. It has a good fit and a good internal consistency.

Indexed as

Concept FormationQuality of LifeAdolescentChildCross-Sectional StudiesHumansPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and Questionnaireschildrenchronic painhealth knowledgepain educationsurvey

Identifiers

PMID33917429
PMCPMC8038728

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.