ArticleCells2021
Beyond Il-5: Metabolic Reprogramming and Stromal Support Are Prerequisite for Generation and Survival of Long-Lived Eosinophil.
Article in Cells, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Eosinophil biology from the standpoint of metabolism: implications for metabolic disorders and asthma.Journal of leukocyte biology · 2024Review
- Neutrophil membrane-camouflaged nanoparticles alleviate inflammation and promote angiogenesis in ischemic myocardial injury.Bioactive materials · 2023Article
- Leptin favors imbalance of antigen-specific CD4Frontiers in immunology · 2023Article
- Eosinophilic airway diseases: basic science, clinical manifestations and future challenges.European clinical respiratory journal · 2022Review
- Eosinophils, beyond IL-5.Cells · 2021Article
- Pulmonary Eosinophils at the Center of the Allergic Space-Time Continuum.Frontiers in immunology · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Eosinophils play surprisingly diverse roles in health and disease. Accordingly, we have now begun to appreciate the scope of the functional and phenotypic heterogeneity and plasticity of these cells. Along with tissue-recruited subsets during inflammation, there are tissue resident eosinophil phenotypes with potentially longer life spans and less dependency on IL-5 for survival. Current models to study murine eosinophils ex vivo rely on IL-5-sustained expansion of eosinophils from bone marrow hematopoietic progenitors. Although it does generate eosinophils (bmEos) in high purity, such systems are short-lived (14 days on average) and depend on IL-5. In this report, we present a novel method of differentiating large numbers of pure bone marrow-derived eosinophils with a long-lived phenotype (llEos) (40 days on average) that require IL-5 for initial differentiation, but not for subsequent survival. We identified two key factors in the development of llEos: metabolic adaptation and reprogramming induced by suppressed nutrient intake during active differentiation (from Day 7 of culture), and interaction with IL-5-primed stromal cells for the remainder of the protocol. This regimen results in a higher yield and viability of mature eosinophils. Phenotypically, llEos develop as Siglec-F(+)Ly6G(+) cells transitioning to Siglec-F(+) only, and exhibit typical eosinophil features with red eosin granular staining, as well as the ability to chemotax to eotaxin Ccl11 and process fibrinogen. This culture system requires less reagent input and allows us to study eosinophils long-term, which is a significant improvement over IL-5-driven differentiation protocols. Moreover, it provides important insights into factors governing eosinophil plasticity and the ability to assume long-lived IL-5-independent phenotypes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.