Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33917284›Full record

ArticleEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2021

BFF: Bayesian, Fiducial, and Frequentist Analysis of Cognitive Engagement among Cognitively Impaired Older Adults.

Shevaun D Neupert, Claire M Growney, Xianghe Zhu, Julia K Sorensen, Emily L Smith, Jan Hannig

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Shevaun D NeupertDepartment of Psychology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5994-3060
Claire M GrowneyDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63130, USA.
Xianghe ZhuDepartment of Psychology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0302-1021
Julia K SorensenDepartment of Psychology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA.
Emily L SmithDepartment of Psychology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7957-0492
Jan HannigDepartment of Statistics and Operations Research, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4164-0173
North Carolina State University · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

SOCIAL COGNITION AND AGINGR01AG005552 · NIA · NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY RALEIGH · PI NEUPERT, SHEVAUN D · 1985 to 2019
$5.0M
NIA NIH HHS R01AG005552-28S1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Engagement in cognitively demanding activities is beneficial to preserving cognitive health. Our goal was to demonstrate the utility of frequentist, Bayesian, and fiducial statistical methods for evaluating the robustness of effects in identifying factors that contribute to cognitive engagement for older adults experiencing cognitive decline. We collected a total of 504 observations across two longitudinal waves of data from 28 cognitively impaired older adults. Participants' systolic blood pressure responsivity, an index of cognitive engagement, was continuously sampled during cognitive testing. Participants reported on physical and mental health challenges and provided hair samples to assess chronic stress at each wave. Using the three statistical paradigms, we compared results from six model testing levels and longitudinal changes in health and stress predicting changes in cognitive engagement. Findings were mostly consistent across the three paradigms, providing additional confidence in determining effects. We extend selective engagement theory to cognitive impairment, noting that health challenges and stress appear to be important moderators. Further, we emphasize the utility of the Bayesian and fiducial paradigms for use with relatively small sample sizes because they are not based on asymptotic distributions. In particular, the fiducial paradigm is a useful tool because it provides more information than

Indexed as

Bayesiancognitive engagementcognitive impairmentfiducial paradigmfrequentist

Identifiers

PMID33917284
PMCPMC8067417
OpenAlexW3142897315

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.