Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33917206›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Work-Related Risk Assessment According to the Revised NIOSH Lifting Equation: A Preliminary Study Using a Wearable Inertial Sensor and Machine Learning.

Leandro Donisi, Giuseppe Cesarelli, Armando Coccia, Monica Panigazzi, Edda Maria Capodaglio, Giovanni D'Addio

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05777304 (Wearable Sensors and Machine Learning), which is not on this map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05777304 completednot on this map

Wearable Sensors and Machine Learning: a Technological Approach to Biomechanical Risk Assessment in Lifting Tasks

TypeobservationalSponsorIstituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri SpARan2010 to 2022Enrolled41ConditionsWearable DevicesArmswearable device
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. A Case Study of Ergonomic Risk Assessment in Slovakia with Respect to EU Standard.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Leandro DonisiDepartment of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9746-2265
Giuseppe CesarelliScientific Clinical Institutes ICS Maugeri, 27100 Pavia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8303-5900
Armando CocciaScientific Clinical Institutes ICS Maugeri, 27100 Pavia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5921-452X
Monica PanigazziScientific Clinical Institutes ICS Maugeri, 27100 Pavia, Italy.
Edda Maria CapodaglioScientific Clinical Institutes ICS Maugeri, 27100 Pavia, Italy.
Giovanni D'AddioScientific Clinical Institutes ICS Maugeri, 27100 Pavia, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many activities may elicit a biomechanical overload. Among these, lifting loads can cause work-related musculoskeletal disorders. Aspiring to improve risk prevention, the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) established a methodology for assessing lifting actions by means of a quantitative method based on intensity, duration, frequency and other geometrical characteristics of lifting. In this paper, we explored the machine learning (ML) feasibility to classify biomechanical risk according to the revised NIOSH lifting equation. Acceleration and angular velocity signals were collected using a wearable sensor during lifting tasks performed by seven subjects and further segmented to extract time-domain features: root mean square, minimum, maximum and standard deviation. The features were fed to several ML algorithms. Interesting results were obtained in terms of evaluation metrics for a binary risk/no-risk classification; specifically, the tree-based algorithms reached accuracies greater than 90% and Area under the Receiver operating curve characteristics curves greater than 0.9. In conclusion, this study indicates the proposed combination of features and algorithms represents a valuable approach to automatically classify work activities in two NIOSH risk groups. These data confirm the potential of this methodology to assess the biomechanical risk to which subjects are exposed during their work activity.

Indexed as

LiftingWearable Electronic DevicesBiomechanical PhenomenaHumansMachine LearningNational Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, U.S.Risk AssessmentUnited Statesbiomechanical risk assessmentergonomicsfeature extractionhealth monitoringIMUsliftingmachine learningNIOSHwearable devicework-related musculoskeletal disorders

Identifiers

PMID33917206
PMCPMC8068056

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.