Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33917154›Full record

ArticleChildren (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Enhancing Value and Uptake for Whole-Population Cohorts of Children and Parents: Methods to Integrate Registries into the Generation Victoria Cohort.

Valerie Sung, Katrina Williams, Ella Perlow, Yanhong J Hu, Susannah Ahern, Joanne M Said, Bill Karanatsios, John L Hopper, John J McNeil, Leo Donnan and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Children (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Cohort Profile: Generation Victoria (GenV).International journal of epidemiology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. The role of Australian clinical quality registries in pregnancy care: A scoping review.The Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Valerie SungMurdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne 3052, Australia.
Katrina WilliamsMurdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne 3052, Australia.
Ella PerlowMurdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne 3052, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7259-1917
Yanhong J HuMurdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne 3052, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0923-7923
Susannah AhernDepartment of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne 3004, Australia.
Joanne M SaidDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne 3052, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6263-0030
Bill KaranatsiosWestern Health Chronic Disease Alliance, Western Health, Melbourne 3021, Australia.
John L HopperMelbourne School of Population of Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne 3053, Australia.
John J McNeilDepartment of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne 3004, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1049-5129
Leo DonnanMurdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne 3052, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2207-9165
Sharon GoldfeldMurdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne 3052, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6520-7094
Melissa WakeMurdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne 3052, Australia.

Funding

The Australian National Health and Medical Research Council 1125687 to V.S., 1160906 to M.W., 1155290 to S.G., 1173690 to J.M., 1137349 to J.M.The Murdoch Children's Research Institute NAThe Paul Ramsay Foundation NAThe Royal Children's Hospital Foundation 2019-1226The Victorian Government NA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Health registries are critical to understanding, benchmarking and improving quality of care for specific diseases and conditions, but face hurdles including funding, bias towards clinical rather than population samples, lack of pre-morbid and outcomes data, and absent cross-registry harmonisation and coordination. Children are particularly under-represented in registry research. This paper lays out novel principles, methods and governance to integrate diverse registries within or alongside a planned children's mega-cohort to rapidly generate translatable evidence. GenV (Generation Victoria) will approach for recruitment parents of all newborns (estimated 150,000) over two years from mid-2021 in the state of Victoria (population 6.5 million), Australia. Its sample size and population denominator mean it will contain almost all children with uncommon or co-morbid conditions as they emerge over time. By design, it will include linked datasets, biosamples (including from pregnancy), phenotypes and participant-reported measures, all of which will span pre-morbid to long-term outcomes. We provide a vignette of a planned new registry for high-risk pregnancies to illustrate the possibilities. To our knowledge, this is the first paper to describe such a methodology designed prospectively to enhance both the clinical relevance of a large multipurpose cohort and the value and inclusivity of registries in a population.

Indexed as

childrenGenV (Generation Victoria)population studiesregistriesregistry trialsresearch methodology

Identifiers

PMID33917154
PMCPMC8067795

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.